[PATCH] xfs_df: a df(1)-like command to list per-ag block and inode usage
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
jeffpc at josefsipek.net
Thu Sep 10 18:31:01 CDT 2009
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 07:21:39PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:46:26PM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > +++ b/db/xfs_df.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
> > +#!/bin/sh
> > +#
> > +# Copyright (c) 2007-2009 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc at josefsipek.net>
> > +#
> > +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > +# under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published
> > +# by the Free Software Foundation.
> > +#
> > +
> > +status=0
> > +DB_OPTS="-p xfs_df -r"
> > +USAGE="Usage: xfs_df [-i] <device>|<mount>"
> > +
> > +while test $# -gt 1; do
> > + case "$1" in
> > + -i)
> > + print_inodes=t
> > + ;;
> > + *)
> > + break
> > + ;;
> > + esac
> > + shift
> > +done
> > +
> > +dev="$1"
>
> Can you use the same boilerplate code as the other wrappers for
> xfs_db parsing the options and showing the usage to make things more
> consistant?
You mean using getopts? Yeah, I was going to, but decided against it since
there's only one option -i, and the other arg is a device name. I'll fix it
up.
> Also any new tools in xfsprogs should really come with a manpage.
Oh, right...documentation :)
> > +case "$print_inodes" in
> > + t)
> > + echo "AG Inodes IUsed IFree Use%"
> > +
> > + tot_ino=0
> > + tot_use=0
> > + tot_fre=0
> > +
> > + for ag in `seq 0 $maxagno`; do
> > + count=`db_wrapper -c "agi $ag" -c "p count"`
> > + freecount=`db_wrapper -c "agi $ag" -c "p freecount"`
> > +
> > + used=`expr $count - $freecount`
> > +
> > + if [ $count -gt 0 ]; then
> > + pused=`expr $used \* 100`
> > + pused=`expr $pused / $count`
> > + else
> > + pused=0
> > + fi
>
> Wouldn't it be much easier to implement all this in C as a new xfs_db
> subcommand?
Ideally, db could do some basic expressions, e.g.,
xfs_db> agi 0
xfs_db> print (count-freecount)/count
expr = 0.12345
I tried looking at db code to make it have a quiet mode (so a print will not
display the 'field = ' part), but I got a bit lost. It's quite possible that
making a df command in db would be simple, I'd have to look at the code
more (it'd certainly run faster).
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.
--
What is the difference between Mechanical Engineers and Civil Engineers?
Mechanical Engineers build weapons, Civil Engineers build targets.
More information about the xfs
mailing list