[PATCH V2] fix readahead calculations in xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents()
Alex Elder
aelder at sgi.com
Wed Oct 7 17:22:26 CDT 2009
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 02:42:26PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> V2: use min() as suggested by Jeff, it's tidier.
>>
>> I disagree with that, with the cast it looks pretty horrible.
>> At least use min_t to avoid the case, but what's wrong with:
>>
>>> + /* bufsize may have just been a guess; don't go negative */
>>> + bufsize = min((bufsize - length), (size_t)0);
>>
>> bufsize = bufsize - length > 0 ? bufsize - length : 0;
>
> ok, that's fine too.
>
> I'll pick one.
>
>> Anyway, takes this as a
>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
>>
>> for any variant.
>>
>
> thanks,
> -Eric
I'm going to put in this version:
bufsize = bufsize > length ? bufsize - length : 0;
I.e.:
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
@@ -854,6 +854,7 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents(
*/
ra_want = howmany(bufsize + mp->m_dirblksize,
mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize) - 1;
+ ASSERT(ra_want >= 0);
/*
* If we don't have as many as we want, and we haven't
@@ -1088,7 +1089,8 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents(
*/
ptr += length;
curoff += length;
- bufsize -= length;
+ /* bufsize may have just been a guess; don't go negative */
+ bufsize = bufsize > length ? bufsize - length : 0;
}
/*
-Alex
More information about the xfs
mailing list