XFS & LVM: unexpected cp when issuing mv
Asdo
asdo at shiftmail.org
Sun Nov 29 08:41:31 CST 2009
Please paste the output of the following 2 commands:
df /disks/sharestore/upload/
df /disks/sharestore/download/
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> I have an unexpected behaviour and I hope someone can explain me the
> reasons:
>
> This is an openSUSE 11.2 virtual machine within XENserver. XENserver can
> only create 2TB disks, but I needed more. So I create 2x 2TB disks for
> that VM. These disks have no partitions, but are straight LVM:
> # pvscan
> PV /dev/xvdb VG sharestore lvm2 [1,95 TB / 0 free]
> PV /dev/xvdc VG sharestore lvm2 [1,95 TB / 0 free]
> Total: 2 [3,91 TB] / in use: 2 [3,91 TB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ]
>
> I created one VG, and then one LV:
> # vgscan
> Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while...
> Found volume group "sharestore" using metadata type lvm2
> # lvscan
> ACTIVE '/dev/sharestore/public' [3,91 TB] inherit
>
> On that LV, I created an XFS filesystem, mounted from /etc/fstab:
> /dev/sharestore/public /disks/sharestore xfs
> noatime,nodiratime,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k,attr2,nobarrier,largeio,swalloc,inode64,prjquota
>
> Now when I move from one dir to another, example
> mv /disks/sharestore/upload/* /disks/sharestore/download/
>
> within some dirs it's a simple mv where only metadata is moved, but with
> some dirs it's a physical cp+rm of the files. You can easily see that by
> the speed of the mv, plus with iostat:
> Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-
> sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
> xvdb 0,00 0,00 0,00 647,31 0,00 28424,75
> 87,82 18,46 29,71 0,24 15,65
> xvdc 0,00 0,40 631,14 2,40 26928,54 76,65
> 85,25 5,56 8,69 1,56 98,84
>
> Until now I believed that a mv within one filesystem is always just a
> metadata mv. But it seems I found a case now where even within the same
> filesystem a physical cp+rm is done. Can someone explain me
>
> 1) why this happens
> 2) how I can prevent this?
>
> We have files >5G there, often 20G or more, so a mv should just be a
> metadata mv, everything else is inacceptable.
> Could it be the way I created the VG + LV, that there's a cp instead mv?
> How could I create all that to get a normal behaviour?
>
> Maybe like this?:
> 1) create VG only on one disk
> 2) create LV on that disk
> 3) create XFS
> 4) extend VG to 2nd disk
> 5) extend LV to 2nd disk
> 6) xfs_growfs to 2nd disk
>
> mfg zmi
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs at oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20091129/1248bf90/attachment.htm>
More information about the xfs
mailing list