xfs_repair question: "wrong" order of AG checks OK?

Nathan Scott nscott at aconex.com
Wed Nov 11 16:17:31 CST 2009


----- "Michael Monnerie" <michael.monnerie at is.it-management.at> wrote:

> I did an xfs_repair now, and everything was OK. But strange was, in
> Phase 4 the AGs were not checked in order:
> AG 2
> AG 1
> AG 0
> AG 3
> AG 4
> AG 5
> 
> Is that normal?

Could be xfs_repair running with multiple threads in parallel?

cheers.

-- 
Nathan




More information about the xfs mailing list