[PATCH 4/7] xfs: remove unused parameter from xfs_reclaim_inodes
Eric Sandeen
sandeen at sandeen.net
Wed May 27 15:44:18 CDT 2009
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <david at fromorbit.com>
>
> The noblock parameter of xfs_reclaim_inodes is only ever set to zero. Remove
> it and all the conditional code that is never executed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david at fromorbit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen at sandeen.net>
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c 2009-05-14 16:20:34.251688779 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c 2009-05-14 16:20:37.012658983 +0200
> @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ xfs_quiesce_fs(
> int count = 0, pincount;
>
> xfs_flush_buftarg(mp->m_ddev_targp, 0);
> - xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
> + xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
>
> /*
> * This loop must run at least twice. The first instance of the loop
> @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ xfs_sync_worker(
>
> if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY)) {
> xfs_log_force(mp, (xfs_lsn_t)0, XFS_LOG_FORCE);
> - xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
> + xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
> /* dgc: errors ignored here */
> error = xfs_qm_sync(mp, SYNC_BDFLUSH);
> error = xfs_sync_fsdata(mp, SYNC_BDFLUSH);
> @@ -701,7 +701,6 @@ STATIC void
> xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
> xfs_mount_t *mp,
> int ag,
> - int noblock,
> int mode)
> {
> xfs_inode_t *ip = NULL;
> @@ -747,25 +746,13 @@ restart:
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (noblock) {
> - if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) {
> - read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
> - continue;
> - }
> - if (xfs_ipincount(ip) ||
> - !xfs_iflock_nowait(ip)) {
> - xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> - read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
> - continue;
> - }
> - }
> read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
>
> /*
> * hmmm - this is an inode already in reclaim. Do
> * we even bother catching it here?
> */
> - if (xfs_reclaim_inode(ip, noblock, mode))
> + if (xfs_reclaim_inode(ip, 0, mode))
> skipped++;
> } while (nr_found);
>
> @@ -780,7 +767,6 @@ restart:
> int
> xfs_reclaim_inodes(
> xfs_mount_t *mp,
> - int noblock,
> int mode)
> {
> int i;
> @@ -788,7 +774,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes(
> for (i = 0; i < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; i++) {
> if (!mp->m_perag[i].pag_ici_init)
> continue;
> - xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, i, noblock, mode);
> + xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, i, mode);
> }
> return 0;
> }
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h 2009-05-14 16:19:44.268809697 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h 2009-05-14 16:20:37.012658983 +0200
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void xfs_quiesce_attr(struct xfs_mount *
> void xfs_flush_inodes(struct xfs_inode *ip);
>
> int xfs_reclaim_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip, int locked, int sync_mode);
> -int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int noblock, int mode);
> +int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int mode);
>
> void xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
> void xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c 2009-05-14 16:19:44.318659340 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c 2009-05-14 16:20:37.013659110 +0200
> @@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ xfs_unmountfs(
> * need to force the log first.
> */
> xfs_log_force(mp, (xfs_lsn_t)0, XFS_LOG_FORCE | XFS_LOG_SYNC);
> - xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_ASYNC);
> + xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_ASYNC);
>
> xfs_qm_unmount(mp);
More information about the xfs
mailing list