question on agcount and agsize
Josh Greenberg
josh at pha.jhu.edu
Tue May 19 09:11:33 CDT 2009
I've just installed xfs for the first time and I'm trying to put an xfs
file system on a large disk. When I just tried with no arguments, it
told me that the agsize was too large and the maximum is 268435455
blocks. I wasn't familiar with allocation groups at all so I researched
this a little bit. I found out what an allocation group is but there
aren't many recommendations on agcount other than "don't make it too
big" because it slows the disk down as it gets full. However, after
playing with the numbers, I found that the lowest number it will accept
for agcount is 44. I now have a file system with the following structure:
meta-data=/dev/md0 isize=256 agcount=44, agsize=266361205 blks
= sectsz=512
data = bsize=4096 blocks=11719892992, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks, unwritten=1
naming =version 2 bsize=4096
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=1
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks
realtime =none extsz=65536 blocks=0, rtextents=0
I have two questions:
1. Does the agcount have to be a power of 2? Almost every example of
agcount I've seen online has been a power of 2 (2, 4, 8, 16, and 32). I
originally tried an agcount of 64 which worked but then tried to size it
down so it wasn't too large. Will this cause problems later.
2. Is 44 too large? Will I experience a slow down as the disk fills?
I've seen people recommend that you not go over agcount=32 and even
someone who said not to exceed agcount=8. What are the long term
ramifications of this?
Thanks,
Josh
More information about the xfs
mailing list