xfstests license clarification?
Christoph Hellwig
hch at infradead.org
Sun Mar 29 02:38:09 CDT 2009
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:54:18AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Since most of the scripts themselves in xfstests make no mention of
> redistribution, and only say "copyright sgi, all rights reserved" etc:
>
> #-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> # Copyright (c) 2006 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> #-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> do we need to do anything in terms of making this look more like Free
> Software (assuming that's the intent?)
>
> It might be a rats-nest, there are a several testcases in src/ gleaned
> from mailing lists & bugs with little or no attribution; OTOH maybe this
> stuff is trivial enough that it doesn't warrant copyright, I dunno.
>
> Is it worth trying to clarify the license on the collection, or is this
> just a can of worms?
While only a couple of files have the same, just with me as a copyright
holder I'm willing to license it under whatever free license suits best.
I suspect BSD might be best for test code like this.
More information about the xfs
mailing list