mkfs.xfs created filesystem larger than underlying device

Michael Moody michael at gsc.cc
Wed Jun 24 18:05:00 CDT 2009


Are there still known issues with NFS and XFS? I'm performing the same test against a jfs formatted filesystem (exported via NFS), and so far, no issues. This is the latest centosplus kernel. Are there mount options which could cause XFS to have corruption?

Michael S. Moody
Sr. Systems Engineer
Global Systems Consulting

Direct: (650) 265-4154
Web: http://www.GlobalSystemsConsulting.com

Engineering Support: support at gsc.cc
Billing Support: billing at gsc.cc
Customer Support Portal:  http://my.gsc.cc

NOTICE - This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify Global Systems Consulting, its subsidiaries or associates. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Global Systems Consulting, its subsidiaries and associates.


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Sandeen [mailto:sandeen at sandeen.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 5:03 PM
To: Michael Moody
Cc: xfs at oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: mkfs.xfs created filesystem larger than underlying device

Michael Moody wrote:
> It still looks wrong:
>
> [root at filer5 /]# xfs_info /mnt/Volume1/
> meta-data=/dev/Volume1-Rep-Store/Volume1-Replicated isize=256    agcount=32, agsize=146716768 blks
>          =                       sectsz=512   attr=0
> data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=4694936576, imaxpct=25
>          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks, unwritten=1
> naming   =version 2              bsize=4096
> log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=32768, version=1
>          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
> realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

4694936576*4096 = 19230460215296

> [root at filer5 /]# df
> Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
...
> /dev/mapper/Volume1--Rep--Store-Volume1--Replicated
>                      18779615232      1056 18779614176   1% /mnt/Volume1

18779615232*1024 = 19230325997568

> [root at filer5 /]# cat /proc/partitions
> major minor  #blocks  name
>
...
>  253     5 18779746304 dm-5

18779746304*1024 = 19230460215296

so in bytes,

xfs_info says:          19230460215296
/proc/partitions says:  19230460215296 (same as above)
df says:                19230325997568 (a little smaller, but ok)

So, I don't see a problem here.

<later....>

> I experienced significant corruption. I had only about 3 files on the
> XFS filesystem, which was then exported via nfs. I ran nfs_stress.sh
> against it, and my files ended up corrupt, and the machine locked up.
> Ideas?

No, not really, not on a kernel this old, and without details about what
was corrupt, what xfs_repair said, what dmesg said, what sysrq-t said, etc.

-Eric





More information about the xfs mailing list