2.6.30 panic - xfs_fs_destroy_inode

Patrick Schreurs patrick at news-service.com
Sat Jun 20 11:31:01 CDT 2009


Just had another one. It's likely we'll have to downgrade to 2.6.28.x.

These servers have 28 SCSI disks mounted separately (JBOD). The workload 
is basically i/o load (90% read, 10% write) from these disks. The 
servers are not extreme busy (overloaded).

xfs_info from a random disk:

sb02:~# xfs_info /dev/sdb
meta-data=/dev/sdb               isize=256    agcount=4, agsize=18310547 
blks
          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=73242187, imaxpct=25
          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=32768, version=2
          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

As you can see we use lazy-count=1. Mount options aren't very exotic: 
rw,noatime,nodiratime

We are seeing these panic's on at least 3 different servers.

If you have any hints on how to investigate, we would greatly appreciate 
it.

-Patrick

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Others aren't hitting this, what sort of workload are you running when 
> you hit it?
> 
> I have not had time to look at it yet but some sort of testcase may 
> greatly help.
> 
> -Eric
> 
> On Jun 20, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Patrick Schreurs <patrick at news-service.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Unfortunately another panic. See attachment.
>>
>> Would love to receive some advice on this issue.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> -Patrick
>>
>> Patrick Schreurs wrote:
>>> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> Patrick Schreurs wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We are experiencing kernel panics on servers running 2.6.29(.1) and 
>>>>> 2.6.30. I've included two attachments to demonstrate.
>>>>>
>>>>> The error is:
>>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim ...
>>>>>
>>>>> OS is 64bit Debian lenny.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this a known issue? Any comments on this?
>>>>
>>>> It's not known to me, was this a recent upgrade?  (IOW, did it start
>>>> with .29(.1)?
>>> We've seen this on 2 separate servers. It probably happened more 
>>> often, but we didn't captured the panic message. One server was 
>>> running 2.6.29.1, the other server was running 2.6.30. Currently 
>>> we've updated all similar servers to 2.6.30.
>>> If we can provide you with more details to help fix this issue, 
>>> please let us know.
>>> -Patrick
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> xfs mailing list
>>> xfs at oss.sgi.com
>>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>> <sb06-20090619.png>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs at oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




More information about the xfs mailing list