[PATCH 1/3] xfs: do not take the iolock in xfs_ireclaim

Christoph Hellwig hch at infradead.org
Fri Jul 31 16:03:41 CDT 2009

Previous message: [PATCH 0/3] more memory allocator recursion fixes
Next message: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: do not take the iolock in xfs_inactive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: xfs-lockdep-ireclaim
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20090731/ad0fb282/attachment.bat>

Previous message: [PATCH 0/3] more memory allocator recursion fixes
Next message: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: do not take the iolock in xfs_inactive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the xfs mailing list