[PATCH] xfsprogs spec file update

Eric Sandeen sandeen at sandeen.net
Sun Jan 25 08:21:00 CST 2009


Nathan Scott wrote:
> Since binaries have moved between xfsprogs and xfsdump packages
> in version 3.0.0, we need to fix the dependencies in the rpm
> specfiles, else rpm will complain.
> 
> While in there, remove xfs-cmds Provides/Obsoletes lines, there
> is no way anyone is ever going to be requiring those anymore (no
> real-world upgrade path having such old skool SGI-released rpms).

Seems fine to me, though before I update Fedora to the next version I'll
probably pass the notion past the true RPM gurus to be sure :)

Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen at sandeen.net>

> diff --git a/build/rpm/xfsprogs.spec.in b/build/rpm/xfsprogs.spec.in
> index 2826a37..cf61225 100644
> --- a/build/rpm/xfsprogs.spec.in
> +++ b/build/rpm/xfsprogs.spec.in
> @@ -5,10 +5,8 @@ Release: @pkg_release@
>  Distribution: @pkg_distribution@
>  Packager: Silicon Graphics, Inc. <http://www.sgi.com/>
>  BuildRoot: @build_root@ 
> -Provides: xfs-cmds
> -Obsoletes: xfs-cmds
>  Prereq: /sbin/ldconfig
> -Conflicts: xfsdump < 2.0.0
> +Conflicts: xfsdump < 3.0.0
>  Source: @pkg_name at -@pkg_version at .src.tar.gz
>  License: GPL
>  Vendor: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
> @@ -32,8 +30,8 @@ with the IRIX version of XFS.
>  %package devel
>  Summary: XFS filesystem-specific static libraries and headers.
>  Group: Development/Libraries
> -Requires: @pkg_name@ >= 2.0.0
> -Conflicts: @pkg_name@ < 2.0.0
> +Requires: @pkg_name@ >= 3.0.0
> +Conflicts: @pkg_name@ < 3.0.0
>  
>  %description devel
>  xfsprogs-devel contains the libraries and header files needed to
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs at oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 




More information about the xfs mailing list