[PATCH] xfstests: add "quick" group
sandeen at sandeen.net
Sun Feb 15 12:42:59 CST 2009
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 01:58:24PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Good plan, couple comments:
>> should quick only be a subset auto tests or are they orthogonal?
> Just a subset of auto, yes.
>> A few tests you've flagged as quick don't met the 20s criteria on my
>> box, just FWIW; may be filesystem-size specific:
>> 013 57
> We need this one for sure.
>> 028 23
>> 031 21
>> 049 36
>> 075 36
>> 076 56
>> 078 20
>> 091 26
>> 112 38
>> 113 55
>> 178 363
>> Most are probably close enough, but 178 looks nasty - seems to be
>> xfs_repair that's taking so long. These are running on 100G partitions,
>> though :)
> 178 only takes 16 seconds for me, running on 10G partitions.
interesting that a 10x size growth makes a 22x time growth.
> I'm fine removing tests, and 178 would be the first candidate, maybe 076
> and 113, too.
Fine by me to leave them in, too, not a big deal - though maybe not 178.
Just wanted to point out that some of this is probably
fs-size-dependent. It'd be neat to have this somehow run based on
what's in the timestamp file, though that requires an initial seed.
I'd just drop 178 and call it good for now.
More information about the xfs