XFS corruption on ubuntu 2.6.27-9-server
George Barnett
george at alink.co.za
Tue Feb 3 19:53:38 CST 2009
On 04/02/2009, at 12:46 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> bad version number 0x0 on inode 18046
>> bad magic number 0x0 on inode 18047
>> bad version number 0x0 on inode 18047
>> bad directory block magic # 0 in block 0 for directory inode 18000
>
> Interesting that all the bad magic numbers were 0... not sure what to
> make of that, offhand, I'm afraid...
Oh dear.
I'm going to try moving the filesystem to ext3 to see if this
continues. If it does, it would suggest a bug in the underlying
raid10 implementation or a problem with the disks, although they're
not reporting any errors [1].
Is there any further debugging I can do before I start fresh?
George
1. The hardware ecc recovered smartctl metric is /very/ high,
although I'm told this may be normal for samsung drives. I cant think
of any way to confirm a disk problem without a CRC checking fs though.
More information about the xfs
mailing list