[PATCH] xfs_db: modify bad_features2 when modifying features2

Eric Sandeen sandeen at sandeen.net
Wed Dec 2 09:19:46 CST 2009


Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:17:55PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> +	if (xfs_sb_has_mismatched_features2(&tsb)) {
>> +		dbprintf(_("Superblock has mismatched features2 fields, "
>> +			   "skipping modification\n"));
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
> 
> However I'm not sure if this one is an all that good idea.  It'll make
> all version updates fail if we have a mismatched features2.  That way
> people can't use xfs_db to fix it up which seems odd.
> 
> To me just printing the warning but not aborting would be the best way
> to inform the user about it.

hm yeah I suppose so.

I wonder if we should catch it somehow on the feature-set shortcuts
like "attr1" but allow it for explicit value sets ...

?

-Eric

> 
>> +
>>  	if ((version & XFS_SB_VERSION_LOGV2BIT) &&
>>  					!xfs_sb_version_haslogv2(&tsb)) {
>>  		tsb.sb_logsunit = 1;
>> @@ -564,7 +570,8 @@ do_version(xfs_agnumber_t agno, __uint16_t version, __uint32_t features)
>>  
>>  	tsb.sb_versionnum = version;
>>  	tsb.sb_features2 = features;
>> -	fields |= XFS_SB_VERSIONNUM | XFS_SB_FEATURES2;
>> +	tsb.sb_bad_features2 = features;
>> +	fields |= XFS_SB_VERSIONNUM | XFS_SB_FEATURES2 | XFS_SB_BAD_FEATURES2;
> 
> This one looks good to me.
> 




More information about the xfs mailing list