failed assertion related to realtime section

Roman Kononov kononov at ftml.net
Tue Aug 4 16:04:32 CDT 2009


On 2009-07-16 05:02, Olaf Weber wrote:
> A quick test on an available system
> running a (much) older kernel runs to completion, so this appears to
> be a regression.

With which kernel version did you run the test?

> Figuring out exactly when/where this regressed will take time.

I went back to 2.6.23 and the same assfail happened with somewhat different 
call trace:

Assertion failed: xfs_trans_get_block_res(tp) > 0, file: 
/home/rk/linux-2.6.23/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5523

Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff80356a08>] xfs_bunmapi+0x8e8/0x1060
  [<ffffffff80227d2a>] dequeue_entity+0x7a/0xb0
  [<ffffffff80380608>] xfs_itruncate_finish+0x398/0x5c0
  [<ffffffff803a2323>] xfs_free_eofblocks+0x263/0x2b0
  [<ffffffff803a4838>] xfs_release+0x118/0x1e0
  [<ffffffff803ae42a>] xfs_file_release+0x1a/0x30
  [<ffffffff802827cd>] __fput+0xcd/0x1e0
  [<ffffffff8027f5c4>] filp_close+0x54/0x90
  [<ffffffff80280e3d>] sys_close+0x9d/0x110
  [<ffffffff8020bc9e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83

I tried to go back to 2.6.22.19 and older, and the test did not run at all 
failing to mount:

XFS: bad version
XFS: SB validate failed

Any suggestions?

Roman




More information about the xfs mailing list