New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com

[Russell Cattelan]

Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> Russell Cattelan wrote:
>> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
>>>  
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> We've got a new xfs git tree on oss.sgi.com at:
>>>>
>>>> git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs
>>>>
>>>> This tree is an automatic mirror of our internal tree so will always
>>>> be up to date.
>>>>
>>>> It supercedes the old xfs-2.6 tree which has a few problems with it's
>>>> merge history.
>>>>
>>>> There's a few branches there already:
>>>>
>>>> 'master'      This will contain all the latest xfs changes not yet 
>>>> pushed
>>>>                to mainline.
>>>> 'mainline'    This is vanilla mainline and will updated regularly.
>>>> 'for-linus'   Our staging branch for pull requests
>>>> 'xfs-dev'     This branch will contain KDB and other supporting 
>>>> code for
>>>>                development and should be identical to the old CVS 
>>>> tree.
>>>>
>>>> Feel free to start using it and let us know if you have any issues.
>>>>     
>>>
>>> First off, cool.  Glad to see this progressing.
>>>
>>> TAKE messages currently have Russell-magic added to the body to link to
>>> a cvs commit for that change.  (however, it always takes up to 24h to
>>> sync...)
>>>   
>> I would still like the ptool tree to come from au to cut down on the 
>> delay.
> We haven't changed any of the ptools->cvs syncing so whatever delays 
> existed
> before are still around but also wont be any worse.
I would  like to avoid the nirvana sync and just move the ptools tree from
longdrop to oss.

Updates would happen faster that way
>
>>
>>> Will cvs still be around & updated?  If not, those messages should be
>>> removed (or changed to point to git commits if possible (probably not
>>> possible).
>>>
>>> -Eric
>>>
>>>   
>>
>>
>