Device loses barrier support (was: Fixed patch for simple barriers.)
Andi Kleen
andi at firstfloor.org
Thu Dec 4 19:37:39 CST 2008
> * barrier support in md-raid1 deviates from the specification at
> Documentation/block/barrier.txt. The specification says that requests
> submitted after the barrier request hit the media after the barrier
> request hits the media. The reality is that the barrier request can be
> randomly aborted and the requests submitted after it hit the media before
> the barrier request.
Yes the spec should be probably updated.
But also see Linus' rant from yesterday about code vs documentation.
When in doubt the code wins.
>
> * the filesystems developed hacks to work around this issue, the hacks
> involve not submitting more requests after the barrier request,
I suspect the reason the file systems did it this way is that
it was a much simpler change than to rewrite the transaction
manager for this.
> synchronously waiting for the barrier request and eventually retrying it.
> These hacks suppress any performance advantage barriers could bring.
>
> * you submit a patch that makes barriers even more often deviate from the
> specification and you argue that the patch is correct because filesystems
> handle this deviation.
Sorry what counts is the code behaviour, not the specification.
-Andi
--
ak at linux.intel.com
More information about the xfs
mailing list