[kdb] [PATCH 0/13] RFC ONLY - kdb for kgdb
Louis Rilling
Louis.Rilling at kerlabs.com
Mon May 11 04:51:54 CDT 2009
On 11/05/09 5:23 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:15:39AM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> > Do you intend to support kdb modules? If yes, in which extent should they be
> > adapted?
>
> I think that would be a very low priority. What would be useful is the
> hack to load debuginfo into kdb so that it can pretty-print arbitrary
> structures. That alone would replace about 90% of the kdb modules I
> think.
>
> And yes, that code in current kdb is even more ugly than core kdb, so
> it would need a major cleanup first.
I was thinking about custom KDB modules, but I agree that most of them could be
replaced by pretty-print of arbitrary structures.
Thanks,
Louis
--
Dr Louis Rilling Kerlabs
Skype: louis.rilling Batiment Germanium
Phone: (+33|0) 6 80 89 08 23 80 avenue des Buttes de Coesmes
http://www.kerlabs.com/ 35700 Rennes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/kdb/attachments/20090511/0ced4435/attachment.sig>
More information about the kdb
mailing list