KDB support for x86_64?
Peter Wainwright
prw at ceiriog.eclipse.co.uk
Sat Apr 1 01:36:06 PST 2006
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 17:32 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:00:46AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> > On Sunday 26 March 2006 21:58, Peter Wainwright wrote:
> > > Is KDB still maintained for the x86_64 architecture? oss.sgi.com has
> > > x86_64 patches for kernel 2.6.14 but not for more recent
> > > kernels. I tried to forward-port it to 2.6.16 myself but it is
> > > not giving a proper backtrace (%rsp seems to be wrong at breakpoints).
> > >
> > > Peter Wainwright
> >
> > I would find it useful too. I've forward ported it as well, and also have the
> > same backtrace problem. I guess it's probably simple to fix, but it doesn't
> > irk me enough that I've bothered to try to fix it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nigel
>
> Did you have the problem with the last patch, there was
> some backtrace changes that I accepted that I did not have
> time to test. It would be useful if you could check a before
> and after of that code.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jack
The change I mentioned in the previous mail actually seems to
simplify things for the debugger, since SS/SP is now saved on
the interrupt stack at breakpoints.
This patch seems to work for me. Unless you can find some path
into kdba_getregcontents where SS/SP is NOT saved in regs?
Peter
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: text/x-patch
-- File: kdb-sssp-x8664.patch
---------------------------
Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
More information about the kdb
mailing list