1 bug cause the kdb-3.0-2.4.20 patch fail to compile
Keith Owens
kaos at sgi.com
Fri Feb 7 23:55:00 PST 2003
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:11:54 +0800 ,
"Zhang, Sonic" <sonic.zhang at intel.com> wrote:
> Yes, your addition to VT100 character sequence works well.
> But I wonder why you don't add these translation in architecture
>dependent function "static int get_serial_char(void);". I think it is better
>to return the meaningful ASCII characters in these architecture dependent
>functions.
(1) vt100 is a global definition, not architecture specific.
(2) The timing algorithms for vt100 mean that you need a global view of
all input sources to determine if the current character is part of
the current vt100 sequence or something else from another data
source.
More information about the kdb
mailing list