Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfstests\:\s+failure\s+to\s+umount\s+ext4\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. xfstests: failure to umount ext4 (score: 1)
Author: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:36:17 +0200
Hi All, Has anyone seen these failures when running xfstests on ext4? My test and scratch partitions are dedicated for xfstests. Thanks, Amir.
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00253.html (8,775 bytes)

2. Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:57:52 -0500
I've not seen it, can you investigate with lsof etc? They both work for me on a quick test, anyway, on a .38 kernel. What are you using for your partitions under test? -Eric
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00254.html (8,784 bytes)

3. Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4 (score: 1)
Author: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:33:19 +0200
OK. I have not given complete information. It does not fail indefinably. I can umount the fs immediately after the failure. Only the test fails because fsck sees a mounted fs. There must be a bit of
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00255.html (10,940 bytes)

4. Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:45:24 -0500
I tried to fix lvm, once, but all the dev symlinks vs. mtab vs. /proc/mounts was a rat's nest, and I gave up... :) -Eric
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00256.html (10,795 bytes)

5. Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4 (score: 1)
Author: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:01:01 +0200
USE_REMOUNT=1 fixes (bypasses) the problem for non scratch tests, so I'm good with it for now :-) Amir.
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00343.html (10,020 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu