Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfslogd\-spinlock\s+bug\?\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:14:02 +1100
Different corruption in RBX here. Looks like semi-random garbage there. I wonder - what's the mac and ip address(es) of your machine and nbd servers? (i.e. I suspect this is a nbd problem, not an XFS
/archives/xfs/2007-01/msg00008.html (10,760 bytes)

2. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:18:08 +0100
-- Original Message -- From: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx> To: "Haar JŠnos" <djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>; <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: M
/archives/xfs/2007-01/msg00064.html (16,442 bytes)

3. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:34:30 +1100
no matches. Oh well, it was a long shot. RBX trashed again with more random garbage. ...... There's something seriously wrong in your kernel that has, AFAICT, nothing to do with XFS. I suggest talkin
/archives/xfs/2007-01/msg00067.html (11,404 bytes)

4. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:15:51 +0100
-- Original Message -- From: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx> To: "Janos Haar" <djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>; <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thu
/archives/xfs/2007-01/msg00074.html (12,454 bytes)

5. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:14:02 +1100
Different corruption in RBX here. Looks like semi-random garbage there. I wonder - what's the mac and ip address(es) of your machine and nbd servers? (i.e. I suspect this is a nbd problem, not an XFS
/archives/xfs/2007-01/msg00248.html (10,760 bytes)

6. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:18:08 +0100
-- Original Message -- From: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx> To: "Haar JŠnos" <djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>; <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: M
/archives/xfs/2007-01/msg00304.html (16,442 bytes)

7. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: )
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:34:30 +1100
no matches. Oh well, it was a long shot. RBX trashed again with more random garbage. ...... There's something seriously wrong in your kernel that has, AFAICT, nothing to do with XFS. I suggest talkin
/archives/xfs/2007-01/msg00307.html (11,404 bytes)

8. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:15:51 +0100
-- Original Message -- From: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx> To: "Janos Haar" <djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>; <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thu
/archives/xfs/2007-01/msg00314.html (12,454 bytes)

9. xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: Haar JŠnos <djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:00:38 +0100
I am the "big red button men" with the one big 14TB xfs, if somebody can remember me. :-) Now i found something in the 2.6.16.18, and try the 2.6.18.4, and the 2.6.19, but the bug still exists: Dec
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00082.html (13,010 bytes)

10. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:32:38 -0500 (EST)
I'm not sure what is causing this problem but I was curious is this on a 32bit or 64bit platform? Justin.
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00092.html (15,290 bytes)

11. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: Haar J√nos <djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:11:00 +0100
This is a 64bit system. But i cannot understand, what is the curious? :-) I am not a kernel developer, and not a C programmer, but the long pointers shows me, the 64 bit. Or am i on the wrong clue?
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00094.html (16,793 bytes)

12. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: Haar J√nos <djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:19:45 +0100
I have some news. I dont know there is a context between 2 messages, but i can see, the spinlock bug comes always on cpu #3. Somebody have any idea? Thanks Janos Dec 16 11:42:48 dy-base BUG: warning
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00113.html (25,462 bytes)

13. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:56:41 +0100
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 0: 100 0 0 4583704 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 0 0 0 2 IO-APIC-edge i8042 4: 0 0 0 3878668 IO-APIC-edge serial 8: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi 12: 0 0 0 3 IO
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00115.html (14,137 bytes)

14. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:24:44 +1100
..... ..... .... I'd say your NBD based XFS filesystem is having trouble. Ok, I've never heard of a problem like this before and you are doing something that very few ppl are doing (i.e. XFS on NBD).
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00118.html (12,437 bytes)

15. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:17:50 +0100
-- Original Message -- From: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx> To: "Haar JŠnos" <djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>; <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: M
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00120.html (17,445 bytes)

16. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:36:37 +1100
Which appears to be a crash in wake_up_process() when doing memory reclaim (waking the xfsbufd). Ok, I've found this pattern: Can you confirm that you are running with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y? If so, we
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00124.html (11,272 bytes)

17. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:39:46 +0100
-- Original Message -- From: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx> To: "Haar JŠnos" <djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>; <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: M
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00126.html (12,213 bytes)

18. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:52:29 +1100
Don't know - it's a different crash, but once again one that I've never heard of occurring before. No, but it does slow your machine down. No - I forgot that config option doesn't exist in mainline X
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00129.html (13,221 bytes)

19. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:47:00 +1100
...... Third try an I got a crash on a poisoned object: 0xe00000300d7d5100 000000005a2cf071 0000000000000000 q.,Z............ 0xe00000300d7d5110 000000005a2cf071 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b q.,Z....kkkkkkkk 0xe
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00130.html (12,252 bytes)

20. Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? (score: 1)
Author: er)
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:44:57 +1100
/archives/xfs/2006-12/msg00175.html (11,039 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu