Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsdump\s+sample\s+scripts\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. ? (score: 1)
Author: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 16:24:01 -0400
g, 16. Mai 2002 17:44 schrieb John Kihonge: This was me :-) I still have the tapes from February which exhibit the problem. I can retest, if you have an idea where to look. I really don't
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00294.html (8,502 bytes)

2. -1.1+DEBUG+dbench = panic (score: 1)
Author: Ian Cumming <ian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 15:42:34 +1000
d/xfstests/common.config - 1.16 - update config for couple of hosts. The following f
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00303.html (9,241 bytes)

3. e: xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 14:39:03 +0800 (PHT)
osted this script to the list last month (I've since tidied it up a little bit), which might be what you are looking for. Basically, I do full (level 0) dumps every Sunday, with increment
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00304.html (8,743 bytes)

4. e: xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1)
Author: Ian Cumming <ian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 16:56:22 +1000
g your script already answered a number of my questions (including can the dumps be compressed). I'm not very familiar yet with how xfsdump and xfsrestore work, but it looks like creating
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00305.html (10,579 bytes)

5. xxxxxx> (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:55:36 +0800 (PHT)
blocks -v /dev/hda2. But it didn't print out any bad blocks, just kept giving me this { DriveSeek ... } error. I guess bad blocks works at a much lower level (ie, it's filesystem independ
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00309.html (8,302 bytes)

6. e: xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1)
Author: Ian Cumming <ian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 22:05:41 +1000
you ever thought of using amanda for your backups? Doing so, you'll get rid of all sorts of implementation details plus a whole bunch of interesting extras (for short). Just a thought. C
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00311.html (9,385 bytes)

7. r on the 2.4.18 XFS tree? (score: 1)
Author: Murthy Kambhampaty <Murthy.Kambhampaty@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:59:56 -0400
teratively restore fr
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00313.html (12,622 bytes)

8. E: xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1)
Author: John Kihonge <mkulima@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:14:49 -0500
for the scripts (I was also in the process of setting up a backup routine, and these will save me a lot of time, and they're more polished than what I would have hacked up). A variation f
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00314.html (9,363 bytes)

9. e: xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1)
Author: John Kihonge <mkulima@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 11:12:46 -0500
storing from level 2 will not work. xfsdump doea a full dump on base dump (level 0) and then succeeding incremental dumps only dumps changes since the previous dump level. To restore to T
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00315.html (9,434 bytes)

10. e: xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1)
Author: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:09:45 -0400
e previous dump level. To restore to T
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00316.html (10,104 bytes)

11. - Small I/O path cleanups (score: 1)
Author: Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 22:11:05 +0200
CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00328.html (8,832 bytes)

12. Status on RH7.3 installer ? (score: 1)
Author: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 16:24:01 -0400
of your work online? I think i'll try to play a little bit with the booting disc image. I did some customised Red Hat installers in the past, so i think there should be no pr
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00932.html (8,502 bytes)

13. e? (score: 1)
Author: Ian Cumming <ian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 15:42:34 +1000
disk flush activity causes enough events to get everything going again.
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00941.html (9,241 bytes)

14. 1.1+DEBUG+dbench = panic (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 14:39:03 +0800 (PHT)
ommon.config - 1.16 - update config for couple of hosts. The following f
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00942.html (8,743 bytes)

15. : xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1)
Author: Ian Cumming <ian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 16:56:22 +1000
cript to the list last month (I've since tidied it up a little bit), which might be what you are looking for. Basically, I do full (level 0) dumps every Sunday, with increment
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00943.html (10,579 bytes)

16. itha Bandara <lashi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:55:36 +0800 (PHT)
a Bandara quotation: Those two "hda:" errors are coming from the IDE layer itself, and are definitely hardware errors. Back up your data immediately and have the disk replaced.
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00947.html (8,302 bytes)

17. dump sample scripts (score: 1)
Author: Ian Cumming <ian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 22:05:41 +1000
n from 1, then from 2? Simply restoring from 2 wouldn't work? --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III : <http://jijo.free.net.ph/> Network Administrator : The Leather Collection, Inc
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00949.html (9,385 bytes)

18. cripts (score: 1)
Author: Murthy Kambhampaty <Murthy.Kambhampaty@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:59:56 -0400
hought. C
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00951.html (12,622 bytes)

19. on the 2.4.18 XFS tree? (score: 1)
Author: John Kihonge <mkulima@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:14:49 -0500
estore fr
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00952.html (9,363 bytes)

20. : xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1)
Author: John Kihonge <mkulima@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 11:12:46 -0500
pts (I was also in the process of setting up a backup routine, and these will save me a lot of time, and they're more polished than what I would have hacked up). A variation f
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00953.html (9,434 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu