Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsdump\s+dumps\s+core\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsdump\s+dumps\s+core\?\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. n your filesystem is dead (score: 1): Author: ns@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:26:35 -0500 (EST); Pentium II 300MHz, 256MB RAM, /home is approximately a 14GB partition, but with only 2.4GB used. Running the kernel-2.4.14-SGI_XFS_1.0.2 rpm downloaded from SGI. xfsprogs-1.3.13-0, xfsdump-1.1.7-0. T; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00481.html (9,105 bytes)
2. dead (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 17 Jan 2002 17:03:12 -0600; The tree here is up to xfsdump-1.1.14, you might want to upgrade. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00482.html (8,241 bytes)
3. ? (score: 1): Author: rd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:31:41 -0500 (EST); Aaahhh...I guess I live by the RPM, since I'm running a Red Hat system (7.1 on this particular box). Is there an easy tarball, or is CVS the only way to get it...I don't have CVS configured (I don't; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00483.html (8,445 bytes)
4. ? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:36:04 +0000; I had a very similar error with xfsdump with a HP Colorado 8GB parallel tape drive that turned out to be a problem with the driver. Basically the weof ioctl was broken. I don't know if that is also y; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00484.html (10,834 bytes)
5. OT] Graphing with GNUPlot (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:08:40 -0500 (EST); Never mind...I followed the CVS instructions on the web site, and am running a "make install-dev" right now, so that I can compile the xfsdump and xfsprogs utilities.; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00491.html (8,781 bytes)
6. angs with 2.4.9-xfs-1.0.2 (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:10:27 -0600 (CST); FWIW, I'll get updated userspace RPMs at ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/command_rpms in the next few minutes... but what's there now is pretty up to date (xfsprogs 1.3.13, for example). -Eric; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00495.html (8,353 bytes)
7. 2 (score: 1): Author: en@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 21:15:00 -0500 (EST); Well, I just compiled xfsdump from the latest CVS, and still dumped.; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00496.html (8,703 bytes)
8. ? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:27:17 -0600; Mike Burger wrote: Well, I just compiled xfsdump from the latest CVS, and still dumped. So a stack trace would help next, one of the folks in Australia may be interested in this. Steve; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00497.html (8,204 bytes)
9. angs with 2.4.9-xfs-1.0.2 (score: 1): Author: en@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:14:50 +1100; If you could send the core file to me, I'll take a look at it. Thanks, Ivan -- Ivan Rayner ivanr@xxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00499.html (8,844 bytes)
10. 2 (score: 1): Author: anr@xxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 03:03:17 -0500 (EST); On its way...thanks.; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00500.html (9,212 bytes)
11. ell scripting (score: 1): Author: n Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:26:35 -0500 (EST); Pentium II 300MHz, 256MB RAM, /home is approximately a 14GB partition, but with only 2.4GB used. Running the kernel-2.4.14-SGI_XFS_1.0.2 rpm downloaded from SGI. xfsprogs-1.3.13-0, xfsdump-1.1.7-0. T; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01410.html (9,105 bytes)
12. ings to do in brooklyn when your filesystem is dead (score: 1): Author: burger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 17 Jan 2002 17:03:12 -0600; The tree here is up to xfsdump-1.1.14, you might want to upgrade. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01411.html (8,241 bytes)
13. hen your filesystem is dead (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:31:41 -0500 (EST); Aaahhh...I guess I live by the RPM, since I'm running a Red Hat system (7.1 on this particular box). Is there an easy tarball, or is CVS the only way to get it...I don't have CVS configured (I don't; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01412.html (8,445 bytes)
14. ead (score: 1): Author: burger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:36:04 +0000; I had a very similar error with xfsdump with a HP Colorado 8GB parallel tape drive that turned out to be a problem with the driver. Basically the weof ioctl was broken. I don't know if that is also y; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01413.html (10,834 bytes)
15. hell scripting (score: 1): Author: <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:08:40 -0500 (EST); Never mind...I followed the CVS instructions on the web site, and am running a "make install-dev" right now, so that I can compile the xfsdump and xfsprogs utilities.; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01420.html (8,781 bytes)
16. Plot (score: 1): Author: pp <hupp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:10:27 -0600 (CST); FWIW, I'll get updated userspace RPMs at ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/command_rpms in the next few minutes... but what's there now is pretty up to date (xfsprogs 1.3.13, for example). -Eric; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01424.html (8,353 bytes)
17. ith GNUPlot (score: 1): Author: Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 21:15:00 -0500 (EST); Well, I just compiled xfsdump from the latest CVS, and still dumped.; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01425.html (8,703 bytes)
18. gs with 2.4.9-xfs-1.0.2 (score: 1): Author: burger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:27:17 -0600; Mike Burger wrote: Well, I just compiled xfsdump from the latest CVS, and still dumped. So a stack trace would help next, one of the folks in Australia may be interested in this. Steve; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01426.html (8,204 bytes)
19. s core? (score: 1): Author: Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:14:50 +1100; If you could send the core file to me, I'll take a look at it. Thanks, Ivan -- Ivan Rayner ivanr@xxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01428.html (8,844 bytes)
20. s core? (score: 1): Author: en@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 03:03:17 -0500 (EST); On its way...thanks.; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01429.html (9,212 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]