Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsaild\s+centisecs\s+\/proc\s+wakeup\s+control\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:44:41 -0700
I was looking at powertop again recently, and noticed xfsbufd and xfsaild at the top of the wakeup list. xfsbufd can be tuned with /proc/sys/fs/xfs/xfsbufd_centisecs along with 3 other time-related t
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00137.html (7,133 bytes)

2. Re: xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:45:12 -0500
On what kernel? As far as the wakeups go, I thought this was fixed; see for example: TAKE 977545 - xfsaild causing too many wakeups on 2.6.27-rc8 with xfs mounted, and powertop 1.9, I don't see xfs u
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00138.html (8,328 bytes)

3. Re: xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:58:56 +1100
No. The xfsaild is currently operating with watchdog functionality to catch AIL push stalls due to a know problem that this new patch: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00119.html fixes. Aft
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00139.html (8,582 bytes)

4. Re: xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:15:32 -0700
Eric Sandeen wrote: On what kernel? 2.6.26.0 (haven't rebooted to 2.6.26.5 yet) As far as the wakeups go, I thought this was fixed; see for example: TAKE 977545 - xfsaild causing too many wakeups --
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00143.html (8,647 bytes)

5. truct xfs_ail (score: 1)
Author: g <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:44:41 -0700
I was looking at powertop again recently, and noticed xfsbufd and xfsaild at the top of the wakeup list. xfsbufd can be tuned with /proc/sys/fs/xfs/xfsbufd_centisecs along with 3 other time-related t
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00957.html (6,918 bytes)

6. ointer into log items (score: 1)
Author: alsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:45:12 -0500
On what kernel? As far as the wakeups go, I thought this was fixed; see for example: TAKE 977545 - xfsaild causing too many wakeups on 2.6.27-rc8 with xfs mounted, and powertop 1.9, I don't see xfs u
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00958.html (8,148 bytes)

7. h removing the mount pointer from the AIL API (score: 1)
Author: <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:58:56 +1100
No. The xfsaild is currently operating with watchdog functionality to catch AIL push stalls due to a know problem that this new patch: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00119.html fixes. Aft
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00959.html (8,402 bytes)

8. dinode_core_t (score: 1)
Author: <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:15:32 -0700
Eric Sandeen wrote: On what kernel? 2.6.26.0 (haven't rebooted to 2.6.26.5 yet) As far as the wakeups go, I thought this was fixed; see for example: TAKE 977545 - xfsaild causing too many wakeups --
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00963.html (8,432 bytes)

9. xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control? (score: 1)
Author: "Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:44:41 -0700
I was looking at powertop again recently, and noticed xfsbufd and xfsaild at the top of the wakeup list. xfsbufd can be tuned with /proc/sys/fs/xfs/xfsbufd_centisecs along with 3 other time-related t
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01775.html (6,975 bytes)

10. Re: xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:45:12 -0500
On what kernel? As far as the wakeups go, I thought this was fixed; see for example: TAKE 977545 - xfsaild causing too many wakeups on 2.6.27-rc8 with xfs mounted, and powertop 1.9, I don't see xfs u
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01776.html (8,196 bytes)

11. Re: xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control? (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:58:56 +1100
No. The xfsaild is currently operating with watchdog functionality to catch AIL push stalls due to a know problem that this new patch: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00119.html fixes. Aft
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01777.html (8,465 bytes)

12. Re: xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control? (score: 1)
Author: Linda Walsh <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:15:32 -0700
Eric Sandeen wrote: On what kernel? 2.6.26.0 (haven't rebooted to 2.6.26.5 yet) As far as the wakeups go, I thought this was fixed; see for example: TAKE 977545 - xfsaild causing too many wakeups --
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01781.html (8,459 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu