- 1. xfs_repair question: "wrong" order of AG checks OK? (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:31:56 +0100
- I did an xfs_repair now, and everything was OK. But strange was, in Phase 4 the AGs were not checked in order: AG 2 AG 1 AG 0 AG 3 AG 4 AG 5 Is that normal? mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc --
- /archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00069.html (6,789 bytes)
- 2. Re: xfs_repair question: "wrong" order of AG checks OK? (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:17:31 +1100 (EST)
- Could be xfs_repair running with multiple threads in parallel? cheers. -- Nathan
- /archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00070.html (7,816 bytes)
- 3. Re: xfs_repair question: "wrong" order of AG checks OK? (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:29:21 +0100
- Would it ever do that? There's no performance advantage in that, as that operation is disk I/O bound, isn't it? mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc -- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 6
- /archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00071.html (8,483 bytes)
- 4. Re: xfs_repair question: "wrong" order of AG checks OK? (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:23:03 +1100 (EST)
- Be worth reading the paper here: http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_Papers_and_Documentation -> "Fixing XFS Filesystems Faster" cheers. -- Nathan
- /archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00072.html (7,489 bytes)
- 5. Re: xfs_repair question: "wrong" order of AG checks OK? (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:52:10 +0100
- Quite a fun to read, especially the comparison with ext3. Thanks for the link. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc -- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP
- /archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00073.html (8,692 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu