Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs_rapair\s+memory\s+requirement\s+per\s+TB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs_rapair\s+memory\s+requirement\s+per\s+TB\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:01:22 -0600; Reading the "Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?" thread this month makes me wonder if there is some type of rough formula or guesstimation cheat sheet to figure out how much memory; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00185.html (7,533 bytes)
2. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:51:41 +1100; Reading the "Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?" thread this month makes me wonder if there is some type of rough formula or guesstimation cheat sheet to figure out how much memory a; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00187.html (8,857 bytes)
3. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:53:39 +0100; Barry Naujok schrieb: Did this change lately? I found the rule of thumb: 2 GB RAM for 1 TB of disk storage + some RAM per x inodes. http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2005-08/msg00045.html I'm intereste; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00193.html (9,513 bytes)
4. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:28:28 +1100; The above is based on actual theoretical usage, the below: was based on reported usage on during live repair runs. I think Barry discovered the difference to be things external to repair such as heap; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00202.html (9,812 bytes)
5. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:26:34 +1100; thread rough Did this change lately? I found the rule of thumb: 2 GB RAM for 1 TB of disk storage + some RAM per x inodes. The above is based on actual theoretical usage, the below: http://oss.sgi.co; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00205.html (10,824 bytes)
6. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:50:16 -0600; Thanks. That is great news about the memory improvements. We currently run SLES 10 SP1 which comes with: hpcxe005:# xfs_repair -V xfs_repair version 2.8.16 others come with: hpcxe001:~ # xfs_repair; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00207.html (10,391 bytes)
7. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:07:14 +0100; Rene Salmon schrieb: I did this today. Compiled 2.9.5 on debian etch and put it in /opt/xfsprogs. Just in case I need it. On #xfs I got the answer that xfs_check and xfs_repair should be fine for an; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00208.html (9,688 bytes)
8. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author:; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:01:09 +1100; filesystem TB Yes, quite a few memory improvements have been made. Right now, I can repair a 9TB filesystem with ~150 million inodes in 2GB of RAM without going to swap using xfs_repair 2.9.4 and wit; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00209.html (11,426 bytes)
9. xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:01:22 -0600; Reading the "Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?" thread this month makes me wonder if there is some type of rough formula or guesstimation cheat sheet to figure out how much memory; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00424.html (7,533 bytes)
10. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author: ); Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:51:41 +1100; Reading the "Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?" thread this month makes me wonder if there is some type of rough formula or guesstimation cheat sheet to figure out how much memory a; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00426.html (8,857 bytes)
11. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:53:39 +0100; Barry Naujok schrieb: Did this change lately? I found the rule of thumb: 2 GB RAM for 1 TB of disk storage + some RAM per x inodes. http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2005-08/msg00045.html I'm intereste; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00432.html (9,513 bytes)
12. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:28:28 +1100; The above is based on actual theoretical usage, the below: was based on reported usage on during live repair runs. I think Barry discovered the difference to be things external to repair such as heap; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00441.html (9,812 bytes)
13. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:26:34 +1100; thread rough Did this change lately? I found the rule of thumb: 2 GB RAM for 1 TB of disk storage + some RAM per x inodes. The above is based on actual theoretical usage, the below: http://oss.sgi.co; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00444.html (10,824 bytes)
14. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:50:16 -0600; Thanks. That is great news about the memory improvements. We currently run SLES 10 SP1 which comes with: hpcxe005:# xfs_repair -V xfs_repair version 2.8.16 others come with: hpcxe001:~ # xfs_repair; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00446.html (10,391 bytes)
15. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:07:14 +0100; Rene Salmon schrieb: I did this today. Compiled 2.9.5 on debian etch and put it in /opt/xfsprogs. Just in case I need it. On #xfs I got the answer that xfs_check and xfs_repair should be fine for an; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00447.html (9,688 bytes)
16. Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:01:09 +1100; filesystem TB Yes, quite a few memory improvements have been made. Right now, I can repair a 9TB filesystem with ~150 million inodes in 2GB of RAM without going to swap using xfs_repair 2.9.4 and wit; /archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00448.html (11,426 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]