Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs_growfs\,\s+lvm\,\s+and\s+sparcs\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Do releases have same or different on disk format? (score: 1)
Author: Tod Detre <tod@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:35:16 -0500
I've been using xfs on linux lvm for quite a while now without any problems on both i386 and alpha systems. I've recently install this on a sparcstation I want to use as a file server and didn't run
/archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00083.html (7,459 bytes)

2. rupted partition with grub in hda1 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 07:03:48 +1100
There was a problem like this a few weeks/months back in the way the tools were handling a new ioctl version; but it should be fixed now (definately in the versions you've listed here...) What does x
/archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00096.html (8,691 bytes)

3. ng the right kernel for XFS (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 21:54:32 +0000
how did you get ide disks connected to a SS5? Sounds more like a Ultra5 to me. If it's really an Ultra5 and you use a sparc64 kernel with a 32bit userland the error is expected.
/archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00098.html (7,850 bytes)

4. Assertion `contextp->dc_nextp < contextp->dc_recendp' failed. (score: 1)
Author: Tod Detre <tod@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 09:29:57 -0500
oops, sorry, you're right it's an Ultrasparc 5 with 64bit kernel. Is there a way around this issue with the 64/32 bit difference? On Saturday, December 7, 2002, at 04:54 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
/archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00104.html (7,906 bytes)

5. e[2]: Troubleshooting? (score: 1)
Author: Tod Detre <tod@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:35:16 -0500
I've been using xfs on linux lvm for quite a while now without any problems on both i386 and alpha systems. I've recently install this on a sparcstation I want to use as a file server and didn't run
/archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00356.html (7,459 bytes)

6. endfile bits (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 07:03:48 +1100
There was a problem like this a few weeks/months back in the way the tools were handling a new ioctl version; but it should be fixed now (definately in the versions you've listed here...) What does x
/archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00369.html (8,691 bytes)

7. E: Clustered XFS? (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 21:54:32 +0000
how did you get ide disks connected to a SS5? Sounds more like a Ultra5 to me. If it's really an Ultra5 and you use a sparc64 kernel with a 32bit userland the error is expected.
/archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00371.html (7,850 bytes)

8. l for XFS (score: 1)
Author: Tod Detre <tod@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 09:29:57 -0500
oops, sorry, you're right it's an Ultrasparc 5 with 64bit kernel. Is there a way around this issue with the 64/32 bit difference? On Saturday, December 7, 2002, at 04:54 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
/archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00377.html (7,906 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu