Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs_fsr\s+for\s+directories\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. xfs_fsr for directories? (score: 1): Author: Bernhard Erdmann <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 01:23:54 +0200; I've noticed on old and heavily used XFS filesystems (Newsspool oder Cyrus IMAP storage) even a "ls" command can take a very long time when there have been 10,000 to 50,000 files in a directory. "ls; /archives/xfs/2004-10/msg00032.html (7,409 bytes)
2. Re: xfs_fsr for directories? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:29:36 -0700; plenty of people yes to *try* to make a directory better if not don't mind the inode changing do somehting like (can't be done whilst it's being accessed though) cd parent/of/said/dir mv dir old-dir; /archives/xfs/2004-10/msg00034.html (7,705 bytes)
3. Re: xfs_fsr for directories? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:18:17 -0700; actually: mkdir temp mv dir/* temp mv temp/* dir rmdir temp will preserve the inode number and is probably as good, ctime/mtime change though; /archives/xfs/2004-10/msg00047.html (7,643 bytes)
4. xfs_fsr for directories? (score: 1): Author: Bernhard Erdmann <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 01:23:54 +0200; I've noticed on old and heavily used XFS filesystems (Newsspool oder Cyrus IMAP storage) even a "ls" command can take a very long time when there have been 10,000 to 50,000 files in a directory. "ls; /archives/xfs/2004-10/msg00189.html (7,409 bytes)
5. Re: xfs_fsr for directories? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:29:36 -0700; plenty of people yes to *try* to make a directory better if not don't mind the inode changing do somehting like (can't be done whilst it's being accessed though) cd parent/of/said/dir mv dir old-dir; /archives/xfs/2004-10/msg00191.html (7,705 bytes)
6. Re: xfs_fsr for directories? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:18:17 -0700; actually: mkdir temp mv dir/* temp mv temp/* dir rmdir temp will preserve the inode number and is probably as good, ctime/mtime change though; /archives/xfs/2004-10/msg00204.html (7,643 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]