- 1. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
- Author: Dirk Munzinger <Dirk.Munzinger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:41:30 +0200
- Hi Seth, Seth Mos schrieb: I just thought of something. What flags are you passing for optimization? I know that compiling with i586 is sometimes faster but I believe not everything works OK. Can you
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00024.html (8,538 bytes)
- 2. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
- Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:48:34 +0200
- At 14:41 2-8-2002 +0200, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Seth, I just thought of something. What flags are you passing for optimization? I know that compiling with i586 is sometimes faster but I believe not
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00025.html (8,947 bytes)
- 3. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 08:53:40 -0400
- Simon Matter schrieb: I was having problems with rsync -av.. one year ago on an almost identical system like you have. The unbelievable solution was to remove the verbose options from rsync!! I have
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00026.html (9,153 bytes)
- 4. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 02 Aug 2002 08:23:38 -0500
- Thanks Seth for pursuing this one. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00028.html (9,151 bytes)
- 5. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
- Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:01:56 +0200
- At 10:41 31-7-2002 +0200, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Eric, Eric Sandeen schrieb: On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 09:29, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Dirk - Take a look in your logs, I'm guessing that the filesystem
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00059.html (9,223 bytes)
- 6. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:41:30 +0200
- Hi Seth, Seth Mos schrieb: I just thought of something. What flags are you passing for optimization? I know that compiling with i586 is sometimes faster but I believe not everything works OK. Can you
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00611.html (8,538 bytes)
- 7. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:48:34 +0200
- At 14:41 2-8-2002 +0200, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Seth, I just thought of something. What flags are you passing for optimization? I know that compiling with i586 is sometimes faster but I believe not
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00612.html (8,947 bytes)
- 8. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 08:53:40 -0400
- Simon Matter schrieb: I was having problems with rsync -av.. one year ago on an almost identical system like you have. The unbelievable solution was to remove the verbose options from rsync!! I have
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00613.html (9,153 bytes)
- 9. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: 02 Aug 2002 08:23:38 -0500
- Thanks Seth for pursuing this one. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00615.html (9,151 bytes)
- 10. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:01:56 +0200
- At 10:41 31-7-2002 +0200, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Eric, Eric Sandeen schrieb: On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 09:29, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Dirk - Take a look in your logs, I'm guessing that the filesystem
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00646.html (9,223 bytes)
- 11. ns? (score: 1)
- Author: hrich@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:29:56 +0200
- t code will not boot? The problem is you need a much more recent XFS than ones which work in 2.4.18 to function with EVMS. Can you restate the unaligned access error? As for an XFS vers
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00384.html (9,550 bytes)
- 12. ync (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jul 2002 09:42:10 -0500
- XFS, I see a problem, will take a little bit to work out the correct fix. Steve
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00385.html (8,964 bytes)
- 13. fo) (score: 1)
- Author: fie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:41:11 +0200
- tition to xfs it was formated with reiserfs and there were no problems. The dis
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00406.html (9,904 bytes)
- 14. ync (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:01:56 +0200
- ition to xfs it was formated with reiserfs and there were no problems. The disk
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00407.html (10,372 bytes)
- 15. ync (score: 1)
- Author: fie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:28:25 +0200
- r the other in 15,30 or 6 hour intervals and all goes well. I suspect broken ha
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00408.html (9,719 bytes)
- 16. ync (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:46:56 +0200
- r the other in 15,30 or 6 hour intervals and all goes well. I suspect broken har
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00409.html (10,878 bytes)
- 17. ync (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:05:52 +0200
- I'm guessing that the filesystem shut down for some reason. (disk error, memory c
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00410.html (10,461 bytes)
- 18. ync (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:21:35 +0200
- inger wrote: Hi Dirk - Take a look in your logs, I'm guessing that the filesystem
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00411.html (10,862 bytes)
- 19. low (score: 1)
- Author: <kaos@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:27:48 +0200
- 2002 12:46:58 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <san
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00413.html (10,163 bytes)
- 20. ync (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:49:00 +0200
- The unbelievable solution was to remove the verbose options from rsync!! Look h
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00414.html (11,206 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu