Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs\-filesystem\s+is\s+broken\s+after\s+rsync\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
Author: Dirk Munzinger <Dirk.Munzinger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:41:30 +0200
Hi Seth, Seth Mos schrieb: I just thought of something. What flags are you passing for optimization? I know that compiling with i586 is sometimes faster but I believe not everything works OK. Can you
/archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00024.html (8,538 bytes)

2. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:48:34 +0200
At 14:41 2-8-2002 +0200, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Seth, I just thought of something. What flags are you passing for optimization? I know that compiling with i586 is sometimes faster but I believe not
/archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00025.html (8,947 bytes)

3. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 08:53:40 -0400
Simon Matter schrieb: I was having problems with rsync -av.. one year ago on an almost identical system like you have. The unbelievable solution was to remove the verbose options from rsync!! I have
/archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00026.html (9,153 bytes)

4. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Aug 2002 08:23:38 -0500
Thanks Seth for pursuing this one. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00028.html (9,151 bytes)

5. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:01:56 +0200
At 10:41 31-7-2002 +0200, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Eric, Eric Sandeen schrieb: On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 09:29, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Dirk - Take a look in your logs, I'm guessing that the filesystem
/archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00059.html (9,223 bytes)

6. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:41:30 +0200
Hi Seth, Seth Mos schrieb: I just thought of something. What flags are you passing for optimization? I know that compiling with i586 is sometimes faster but I believe not everything works OK. Can you
/archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00611.html (8,538 bytes)

7. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:48:34 +0200
At 14:41 2-8-2002 +0200, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Seth, I just thought of something. What flags are you passing for optimization? I know that compiling with i586 is sometimes faster but I believe not
/archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00612.html (8,947 bytes)

8. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 08:53:40 -0400
Simon Matter schrieb: I was having problems with rsync -av.. one year ago on an almost identical system like you have. The unbelievable solution was to remove the verbose options from rsync!! I have
/archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00613.html (9,153 bytes)

9. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: 02 Aug 2002 08:23:38 -0500
Thanks Seth for pursuing this one. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00615.html (9,151 bytes)

10. Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:01:56 +0200
At 10:41 31-7-2002 +0200, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Eric, Eric Sandeen schrieb: On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 09:29, Dirk Munzinger wrote: Hi Dirk - Take a look in your logs, I'm guessing that the filesystem
/archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00646.html (9,223 bytes)

11. ns? (score: 1)
Author: hrich@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:29:56 +0200
t code will not boot? The problem is you need a much more recent XFS than ones which work in 2.4.18 to function with EVMS. Can you restate the unaligned access error? As for an XFS vers
/archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00384.html (9,550 bytes)

12. ync (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Jul 2002 09:42:10 -0500
XFS, I see a problem, will take a little bit to work out the correct fix. Steve
/archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00385.html (8,964 bytes)

13. fo) (score: 1)
Author: fie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:41:11 +0200
tition to xfs it was formated with reiserfs and there were no problems. The dis
/archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00406.html (9,904 bytes)

14. ync (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:01:56 +0200
ition to xfs it was formated with reiserfs and there were no problems. The disk
/archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00407.html (10,372 bytes)

15. ync (score: 1)
Author: fie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:28:25 +0200
r the other in 15,30 or 6 hour intervals and all goes well. I suspect broken ha
/archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00408.html (9,719 bytes)

16. ync (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:46:56 +0200
r the other in 15,30 or 6 hour intervals and all goes well. I suspect broken har
/archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00409.html (10,878 bytes)

17. ync (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:05:52 +0200
I'm guessing that the filesystem shut down for some reason. (disk error, memory c
/archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00410.html (10,461 bytes)

18. ync (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:21:35 +0200
inger wrote: Hi Dirk - Take a look in your logs, I'm guessing that the filesystem
/archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00411.html (10,862 bytes)

19. low (score: 1)
Author: <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:27:48 +0200
2002 12:46:58 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <san
/archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00413.html (10,163 bytes)

20. ync (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:49:00 +0200
The unbelievable solution was to remove the verbose options from rsync!! Look h
/archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00414.html (11,206 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu