Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*x86\:\s+4kstacks\s+default\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*x86\:\s+4kstacks\s+default\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. nd paintings added - 19.04.2008 5:06:55 (score: 1): Author: "Oliver Pinter" <oliver.pntr@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:35:31 +0200; , 16 Apr 2008 18:01:35 -0600 vous écriviez: Well I know from experience that xfs_repair may bite, unfortunately, and that 3Ware RAID-5 really is touchy about power... BBU really is a must. An; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00336.html (11,159 bytes)
2. .2008 5:06:55 (score: 1): Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:19:11 +0300; air may bite, unfortunately, and that 3Ware RAID-5 really is touchy about power... BBU really is a must. An; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00337.html (9,229 bytes)
3. tacks default (score: 1): Author: "Oliver Pinter" <oliver.pntr@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:42:05 +0200; t us inform you about the new additions on the gallery's site: 1. Personal page of Ulybin Gennadiy added 2. Personal page of Demakov Yevgen; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00338.html (10,902 bytes)
4. tacks default (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:56:09 -0500; ge of Demakov Yevgen; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00339.html (9,650 bytes)
5. report (score: 1): Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:42:28 +0300; ckup disk failed also verified without error - rebuilt after abrupt power shut down cannot mount - inconsistencies indicated - could not dump fs H; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00344.html (10,438 bytes)
6. ota tool exit status + bugzilla problem (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:48:40 +0200; going from 6k to 4k. Your "You can always come up with something that will crash in" point would be invariant to this change (although it might be harder to trigger in real life). Why should u; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00346.html (9,843 bytes)
7. zilla problem (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:59:39 -0700; should u; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00347.html (9,487 bytes)
8. tings gallery presents] - New painters and paintings added - 19.04.2008 5:06:55 (score: 1): Author: "Oliver Pinter" <oliver.pntr@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:35:31 +0200; ld be to not bother by default, but occasionally run oprofile with icache and branch misprediction profiling for macro benchmarks (significant user space code running) and if you see any ica; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00932.html (11,159 bytes)
9. New painters and paintings added - 19.04.2008 5:06:55 (score: 1): Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:19:11 +0300; misprediction profiling for macro benchmarks (significant user space code running) and if you see any ica; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00933.html (9,229 bytes)
10. added - 19.04.2008 5:06:55 (score: 1): Author: "Oliver Pinter" <oliver.pntr@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:42:05 +0200; for likely and unlikely paths, and that it actually was well-profiled and tested. Did that ever get translated into Linux hints? -Eric; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00934.html (10,902 bytes)
11. 5 (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:56:09 -0500; ux hints? -Eric; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00935.html (9,650 bytes)
12. o (score: 1): Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:42:28 +0300; always problems. You can always come up with something that will crash in 4k, IMHO. Rather than foisting this upon everyone, I'd rather see work put into making stack size a boot parameter; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00940.html (10,438 bytes)
13. Re: x86: 4kstacks default (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:48:40 +0200; isk failed also verified without error - rebuilt after abrupt power shut down cannot mount - inconsistencies indicated - could not dump fs H; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00942.html (9,843 bytes)
14. [PATCH] xfs_quota tool exit status + bugzilla problem (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:59:39 -0700; ic; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00943.html (9,487 bytes)
15. Re: x86: 4kstacks default (score: 1): Author: "Oliver Pinter" <oliver.pntr@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:35:31 +0200; Hi Ingo! with the older kernel is typical: xfs+nfs+4k stack(+lvm) -- Thanks, Oliver; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01528.html (11,430 bytes)
16. Re: x86: 4kstacks default (score: 1): Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:19:11 +0300; Does anyone still experience problems with 2.6.25? We all know that there once were problems, but if there are any left they should be reported and fixed. cu Adrian --; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01529.html (9,515 bytes)
17. Re: x86: 4kstacks default (score: 1): Author: "Oliver Pinter" <oliver.pntr@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:42:05 +0200; I dont know, thet this problem presentiert in 2.6.25, but im older kernels yes (2.6.22> or 2.6.23>). -- Thanks, Oliver; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01530.html (11,195 bytes)
18. Re: x86: 4kstacks default (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:56:09 -0500; There are always problems. You can always come up with something that will crash in 4k, IMHO. Rather than foisting this upon everyone, I'd rather see work put into making stack size a boot parameter; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01531.html (9,943 bytes)
19. Re: x86: 4kstacks default (score: 1): Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:42:28 +0300; We are going from 6k to 4k. Your "You can always come up with something that will crash in" point would be invariant to this change (although it might be harder to trigger in real life). Why should u; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01536.html (10,746 bytes)
20. Re: x86: 4kstacks default (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:48:40 +0200; But what are a few crashes compared against the ability to run 50000 kernel threads on a 32bit machine? Something has to give in the aim for useless checkbox numbers after all. -Andi; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01538.html (10,297 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]