Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*vmlinux\.lds\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*vmlinux\.lds\s+question\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. le? (score: 1): Author: dirk <dirk@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 12:39:45 +0100; Hi all, When trying to recompile my 2.4.14 kernel I had a linking error. I have succeeded in the past to compile this kernel and as of now it doesn't work anymore. I am using debian woody and I think; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00153.html (7,717 bytes)
2. ion (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:02:50 +0100; It's ok. You can trust the kernel with that change. The problem is that Debian woody uses too new binutils which added this warning for a situation that was previously not warned about. When XFS swi; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00154.html (7,583 bytes)
3. ion (score: 1): Author: dirk <dirk@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:09:05 +0100; Good news! Too new binutils?? These are not tolerant enough then? Thanks for your quick reaction. Dirk; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00155.html (7,945 bytes)
4. ion (score: 1): Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 00:57:09 +0800 (PHT); This actually has nothing to do with XFS. It's a known incompatibility with the existing 2.4 kernels and the latest release of binutils. It's partially fixed in 2.4.17 and supposed to be completely f; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00156.html (7,805 bytes)
5. a file? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 12:39:45 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00727.html (7,717 bytes)
6. uestion (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:02:50 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00728.html (7,583 bytes)
7. uestion (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:09:05 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00729.html (7,945 bytes)
8. uestion (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 00:57:09 +0800 (PHT); /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00730.html (7,805 bytes)
9. vmlinux.lds question (score: 1): Author: dirk <dirk@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 12:39:45 +0100; Hi all, When trying to recompile my 2.4.14 kernel I had a linking error. I have succeeded in the past to compile this kernel and as of now it doesn't work anymore. I am using debian woody and I think; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01301.html (7,717 bytes)
10. Re: vmlinux.lds question (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:02:50 +0100; It's ok. You can trust the kernel with that change. The problem is that Debian woody uses too new binutils which added this warning for a situation that was previously not warned about. When XFS swi; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01302.html (7,641 bytes)
11. Re: vmlinux.lds question (score: 1): Author: dirk <dirk@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:09:05 +0100; Good news! Too new binutils?? These are not tolerant enough then? Thanks for your quick reaction. Dirk; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01303.html (8,068 bytes)
12. Re: vmlinux.lds question (score: 1): Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 00:57:09 +0800 (PHT); This actually has nothing to do with XFS. It's a known incompatibility with the existing 2.4 kernels and the latest release of binutils. It's partially fixed in 2.4.17 and supposed to be completely f; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01304.html (7,849 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]