Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*vim\s+file\s+write\s+mode\s+on\s+journaling\s+fs\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*vim\s+file\s+write\s+mode\s+on\s+journaling\s+fs\.\s*$/: 60 ]

Total 60 documents matching your query.

1. ems (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:54:41 +0200; CVS on July 11 on a 2-processor Dell server. I'm serving a 200 GB hardware RAID XFS filesystem to a couple of Origin 200 servers. (I had to apply a small p; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00305.html (13,439 bytes)
2. 7.1 XFS 1.0 installer (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:35:23 -0500; atches but yes there are patches for 2.4.7 on the FTP site. Not neccesarily. The cvs tree; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00312.html (9,209 bytes)
3. roblems (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 20:31:30 +0200; RIX 6.5.12m clients. i have not seen that behavior, but the nfs server is hardly loaded. i; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00315.html (12,878 bytes)
4. s. (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 20:58:02 +0200 (CEST); write the data out within a second or so? Assuming the harddisk is idle. I suppose you do; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00317.html (13,452 bytes)
5. s. (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 22:43:34 +0200 (CEST); be masking the problem. One sync exit wouldn't make that much of difference, You can only; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00319.html (11,000 bytes)
6. xfs_attrctl_by_handle (score: 1): Author: xxxxx; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 23:19:46 +0200; iinstead of the changes. I asume this is the case. I will try this in a moment. Quiting m; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00321.html (10,464 bytes)
7. ode on journaling fs. (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:24:04 -0400; This would cause xfsdump to segfault (to try this, attrctl a device file, unmount & remo; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00322.html (9,602 bytes)
8. ode on journaling fs. (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:56:54 -0500; se. already? The following script was used. echo Test > file1 cp file1 file2 rm file1 When the script completes I hit the big red switch and sure enough. After recovery the file; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00323.html (11,931 bytes)
9. n (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 12:42:21 +0200; ould it? Could RPM po; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00331.html (12,647 bytes)
10. : is oss.sgi.com down (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 21:58:48 +0200; urse I wouldn't expect data to be restored when I switch off a system while it's busy wit; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00333.html (10,839 bytes)
11. : is oss.sgi.com down (score: 1): Author: asch); Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 20:48:01 +0200; very, or did you look in the swapfile itself? When Vim overwrites the original file, the swap file is flushed, because it can't use the original file to recover from then. That; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00335.html (12,169 bytes)
12. ivers w/ devfs + xfs? (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 17:21:29 +0200; did: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:100588a cmd/xfsprogs/db/bit.c - 1.3 - Fix big endian platform problem; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00338.html (10,747 bytes)
13. ode on journaling fs. (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 10:51:57 -0500; on't know if this is specific to the xfs tree but since I don't use the normal kernel tree; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00339.html (11,865 bytes)
14. ode on journaling fs. (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 09:53:20 -0500; tart writing out dirty data blocks then. This doesn't cause a performance drop and greatly; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00340.html (13,568 bytes)
15. ivers w/ devfs + xfs? (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 16:26:32 -0500; pass icmp packets. You can't ping it but you can telnet to port 80 :-) Groet -- Seth Every; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00343.html (13,125 bytes)
16. : is oss.sgi.com down (score: 1): Author: asch); Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 23:51:54 +0200; e file data out to disk, it is Linux. The bdflush daemon is responsible for this, that 30; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00345.html (12,908 bytes)
17. ode on journaling fs. (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 16:59:19 -0500; ut is not very conclusive. I guess Code Red is working its way through the Internet and e; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00346.html (10,147 bytes)
18. ivers w/ devfs + xfs? (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 01:37:20 +0200; tarfile itself contains the true original modes. There is no problem for a C program to se; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00349.html (10,140 bytes)
19. ode on journaling fs. (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 04:44:02 +0200; ev every time you boot, though I can't remember which one it was... Did you look into the; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00350.html (10,145 bytes)
20. ode on journaling fs. (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 13:49:12 +0800 (PHT); nterest. First, JFS only logs operations on meta-data, so replaying the log only restores; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00351.html (11,507 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]