Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*take\s+messages\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*take\s+messages\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. md array (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 12:27:10 +0200; folks, any chance to get take messages sent to the list, please? Kust saw the tree is merged up to 2.6.25 (why not .26-rc, btw?) and there's been no take message sent to the list again..; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00244.html (7,092 bytes)
2. md array (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 10:30:32 +1000; Christoph Hellwig wrote: folks, any chance to get take messages sent to the list, please? do you mean for any checkin, or just oss pushes? Kust saw the tree is merged up to 2.6.25 (why not .26-rc, bt; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00254.html (8,960 bytes)
3. ernal log (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 08:00:22 +0200; Well, the oss pushes are automatic, so it should be sent with the actual commit. Even better would be migrating XFS to a proper git tree with a commit trigger so that people can't accidentally forget; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00259.html (8,094 bytes)
4. e to fail (score: 1): Author: ); Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:44:53 +1000; Mark Goodwin wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: folks, any chance to get take messages sent to the list, please? do you mean for any checkin, or just oss pushes? Kust saw the tree is merged up to 2.6.25; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00275.html (9,165 bytes)
5. rror path (score: 1): Author: ); Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:50:16 +1000; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:30:32AM +1000, Mark Goodwin wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: folks, any chance to get take messages sent to the list, please? do you mean for any ch; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00278.html (8,994 bytes)
6. it isn't (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 06:20:12 -0400; They aren't? Back in the days the CVS tree on OSS was updated from ptools once a day.; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00298.html (8,197 bytes)
7. messages (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 21:39:20 +1000; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:50:16AM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: oss pushes automatic? They could be but aren't. They aren't? Back in the days the CVS tree on OSS was updated; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00299.html (9,456 bytes)
8. try cache (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 14:29:50 -0500; Mark Goodwin wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:50:16AM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: oss pushes automatic? They could be but aren't. They aren't? Back in the days the CVS tre; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00304.html (9,808 bytes)
9. S won't mount on partitioned md array (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 12:27:10 +0200; holding a few Tb of data..; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00728.html (7,092 bytes)
10. S won't mount on partitioned md array (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 10:30:32 +1000; ut maybe by design... -Eric; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00738.html (8,960 bytes)
11. A test for mounting with external log (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 08:00:22 +0200; A output created by $seq" h; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00743.html (8,094 bytes)
12. 951 - allow xfs_args_allocate to fail (score: 1): Author: er); Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:44:53 +1000; to: longdrop.melbourne.sgi.; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00759.html (9,165 bytes)
13. to xfs_binval in the mount error path (score: 1): Author: er); Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:50:16 +1000; just before xfs_free_buftar; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00762.html (8,994 bytes)
14. ystem reports as full though it isn't (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 06:20:12 -0400; ure. Thanks for the report!; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00782.html (8,197 bytes)
15. ull though it isn't (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 21:39:20 +1000; ted from ptools once a day.; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00783.html (9,456 bytes)
16. se-insensitive match for dentry cache (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 14:29:50 -0500; you are going to dereferenc; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00788.html (9,808 bytes)
17. take messages (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 12:27:10 +0200; folks, any chance to get take messages sent to the list, please? Kust saw the tree is merged up to 2.6.25 (why not .26-rc, btw?) and there's been no take message sent to the list again..; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01212.html (7,092 bytes)
18. Re: take messages (score: 1): Author: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 10:30:32 +1000; do you mean for any checkin, or just oss pushes? Kust saw the tree is merged up to 2.6.25 (why not .26-rc, btw?) and there's been no take message sent to the list again.. Lachlan was held up with QA; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01222.html (8,849 bytes)
19. Re: take messages (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 08:00:22 +0200; Well, the oss pushes are automatic, so it should be sent with the actual commit. Even better would be migrating XFS to a proper git tree with a commit trigger so that people can't accidentally forget; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01227.html (8,172 bytes)
20. Re: take messages (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:44:53 +1000; do you mean for any checkin, or just oss pushes? Kust saw the tree is merged up to 2.6.25 (why not .26-rc, btw?) and there's been no take message sent to the list again.. Lachlan was held up with QA; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01243.html (9,187 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]