Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*skb\s+allocation\s+problems\s+$More\s+Brain\s+damage\!$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*skb\s+allocation\s+problems\s+$More\s+Brain\s+damage\!$\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:15:49 +0300; yep, at first i thought it was because of sume stupidity in my module...but now it seems that actually it is not my code which is doing something stupid....just now i have found out that even simple; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00022.html (9,425 bytes)
2. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:20:29 +0100 (IST); What compiler are you using to compile the kernel? Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied@xxxxxxxxx pam_smb / Linux DecStation / Linux VAX / ILUG person; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00023.html (10,544 bytes)
3. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:24:38 +0300; gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) imran; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00024.html (8,302 bytes)
4. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Bart Trojanowski <bart@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:47:18 -0400 (EDT); Coudl the problem be in the NIC driver not in the alloc_skb? I have used both 2.4.{1,3} for some time and never seen this corruption. I use ping -f with various packet sizes for stress testing my IPS; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00025.html (11,221 bytes)
5. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 21:22:36 +0300; No, i don't think so...i got the dump of the packet at the local_out and post routing hooks....& found it in bad shape there. Here it is what it looks like: 45 0 0 80 0 0 40 0 ff 1 2d f8 c0 a8 66 16; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00026.html (11,639 bytes)
6. Re: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:25:12 +0200; The NIC is not directly involved in alloc_skb() (except maybe if it corrupts internal data structures of the allocator) -Andi; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00027.html (9,247 bytes)
7. Re: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:28:31 +0200; What you can try is to turn on slab debugging. Set the FORCED_DEBUG define in mm/slab.c to one and recompile. Does it change any pattern when you dump the data in the skbs or pings? If yes someone is; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00028.html (8,957 bytes)
8. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:02:46 +0300; I think the dump that i got suggests something more strange than that. This is what i can make of the dump: this is the ip header (with src addr: 192.168.102.22 and dest addr: 192.168.10.29) 45 0 0; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00029.html (8,746 bytes)
9. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:15:49 +0300; yep, at first i thought it was because of sume stupidity in my module...but now it seems that actually it is not my code which is doing something stupid....just now i have found out that even simple; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00122.html (9,425 bytes)
10. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:20:29 +0100 (IST); What compiler are you using to compile the kernel? Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied@xxxxxxxxx pam_smb / Linux DecStation / Linux VAX / ILUG person; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00123.html (10,633 bytes)
11. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:24:38 +0300; gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) imran; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00124.html (8,317 bytes)
12. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Bart Trojanowski <bart@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:47:18 -0400 (EDT); Coudl the problem be in the NIC driver not in the alloc_skb? I have used both 2.4.{1,3} for some time and never seen this corruption. I use ping -f with various packet sizes for stress testing my IPS; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00125.html (11,340 bytes)
13. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 21:22:36 +0300; No, i don't think so...i got the dump of the packet at the local_out and post routing hooks....& found it in bad shape there. Here it is what it looks like: 45 0 0 80 0 0 40 0 ff 1 2d f8 c0 a8 66 16; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00126.html (11,684 bytes)
14. Re: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:25:12 +0200; The NIC is not directly involved in alloc_skb() (except maybe if it corrupts internal data structures of the allocator) -Andi; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00127.html (9,513 bytes)
15. Re: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:28:31 +0200; What you can try is to turn on slab debugging. Set the FORCED_DEBUG define in mm/slab.c to one and recompile. Does it change any pattern when you dump the data in the skbs or pings? If yes someone is; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00128.html (9,152 bytes)
16. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1): Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:02:46 +0300; I think the dump that i got suggests something more strange than that. This is what i can make of the dump: this is the ip header (with src addr: 192.168.102.22 and dest addr: 192.168.10.29) 45 0 0; /archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00129.html (8,746 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]