Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*skb\s+allocation\s+problems\s+\(More\s+Brain\s+damage\!\)\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:15:49 +0300
yep, at first i thought it was because of sume stupidity in my module...but now it seems that actually it is not my code which is doing something stupid....just now i have found out that even simple
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00022.html (9,425 bytes)

2. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:20:29 +0100 (IST)
What compiler are you using to compile the kernel? Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied@xxxxxxxxx pam_smb / Linux DecStation / Linux VAX / ILUG person
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00023.html (10,544 bytes)

3. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:24:38 +0300
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) imran
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00024.html (8,302 bytes)

4. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Bart Trojanowski <bart@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:47:18 -0400 (EDT)
Coudl the problem be in the NIC driver not in the alloc_skb? I have used both 2.4.{1,3} for some time and never seen this corruption. I use ping -f with various packet sizes for stress testing my IPS
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00025.html (11,221 bytes)

5. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 21:22:36 +0300
No, i don't think so...i got the dump of the packet at the local_out and post routing hooks....& found it in bad shape there. Here it is what it looks like: 45 0 0 80 0 0 40 0 ff 1 2d f8 c0 a8 66 16
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00026.html (11,639 bytes)

6. Re: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:25:12 +0200
The NIC is not directly involved in alloc_skb() (except maybe if it corrupts internal data structures of the allocator) -Andi
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00027.html (9,247 bytes)

7. Re: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:28:31 +0200
What you can try is to turn on slab debugging. Set the FORCED_DEBUG define in mm/slab.c to one and recompile. Does it change any pattern when you dump the data in the skbs or pings? If yes someone is
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00028.html (8,957 bytes)

8. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:02:46 +0300
I think the dump that i got suggests something more strange than that. This is what i can make of the dump: this is the ip header (with src addr: 192.168.102.22 and dest addr: 192.168.10.29) 45 0 0
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00029.html (8,746 bytes)

9. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:15:49 +0300
yep, at first i thought it was because of sume stupidity in my module...but now it seems that actually it is not my code which is doing something stupid....just now i have found out that even simple
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00122.html (9,425 bytes)

10. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:20:29 +0100 (IST)
What compiler are you using to compile the kernel? Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied@xxxxxxxxx pam_smb / Linux DecStation / Linux VAX / ILUG person
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00123.html (10,633 bytes)

11. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:24:38 +0300
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) imran
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00124.html (8,317 bytes)

12. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Bart Trojanowski <bart@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:47:18 -0400 (EDT)
Coudl the problem be in the NIC driver not in the alloc_skb? I have used both 2.4.{1,3} for some time and never seen this corruption. I use ping -f with various packet sizes for stress testing my IPS
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00125.html (11,340 bytes)

13. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 21:22:36 +0300
No, i don't think so...i got the dump of the packet at the local_out and post routing hooks....& found it in bad shape there. Here it is what it looks like: 45 0 0 80 0 0 40 0 ff 1 2d f8 c0 a8 66 16
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00126.html (11,684 bytes)

14. Re: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:25:12 +0200
The NIC is not directly involved in alloc_skb() (except maybe if it corrupts internal data structures of the allocator) -Andi
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00127.html (9,513 bytes)

15. Re: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:28:31 +0200
What you can try is to turn on slab debugging. Set the FORCED_DEBUG define in mm/slab.c to one and recompile. Does it change any pattern when you dump the data in the skbs or pings? If yes someone is
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00128.html (9,152 bytes)

16. RE: skb allocation problems (More Brain damage!) (score: 1)
Author: Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:02:46 +0300
I think the dump that i got suggests something more strange than that. This is what i can make of the dump: this is the ip header (with src addr: 192.168.102.22 and dest addr: 192.168.10.29) 45 0 0
/archives/netdev/2001-04/msg00129.html (8,746 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu