Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sis900\s+oops\s+on\s+resume\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sis900\s+oops\s+on\s+resume\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author: bert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:24:03 +0100; t; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00626.html (11,750 bytes)
2. Re: sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author: toph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:10:08 +0100; -; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00627.html (11,046 bytes)
3. Re: sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author: minger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 03:14:25 +0100; .; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00639.html (8,708 bytes)
4. Re: sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:44:31 +0100; n; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00648.html (9,221 bytes)
5. Re: sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:46:02 +0100; v; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00649.html (9,248 bytes)
6. Re: sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author: vittrup.larsen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:01:46 +0100; n; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00713.html (9,437 bytes)
7. sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author: maximilian attems <janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:24:03 +0100; happens since the use of guessnet, guessnet is based on divine and sends arp requests to network. network was down after the oops, but beside resume system worked. uname -a: Linux sputnik 2.6.10-rc2-; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01680.html (11,750 bytes)
8. Re: sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:10:08 +0100; Hi! And where do you see the oops? Irq 10 does not work, that's only backtrace. Fix the sis900 driver... Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01681.html (11,104 bytes)
9. Re: sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author: maximilian attems <janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 03:14:25 +0100; ok, i'm not that familiar with suspend pathes, what's going wrong in sis900_resume() or sis900_suspend()? maks; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01693.html (8,797 bytes)
10. Re: sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author: Daniele Venzano <webvenza@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:44:31 +0100; I'm aware of this problem, sis900 looses the first interrupt after resume, I have to check the code. On my tests the card, after that lost interrupt, worked normally. Is that your case, or do you hav; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01702.html (9,353 bytes)
11. Re: sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author: maximilian attems <janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:46:02 +0100; well it works, as long as i do not use guessnet(8), as described in the bug report, but the lost interrupt is reported on every resume. -- maks; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01703.html (9,396 bytes)
12. Re: sis900 oops on resume (score: 1): Author: Daniele Venzano <webvenza@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:01:46 +0100; Unfortunately I'm no longer able to reproduce this problem. I just tried to suspend/resume with a running ping -f and I can't see any lost or abnormal interrupts. There is a noticeable delay after re; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01767.html (9,628 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]