Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sis900\:\s+eth0\:\s+NULL\s+pointer\s+encountered\s+in\s+Rx\s+ring\,\s+skipping\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sis900\:\s+eth0\:\s+NULL\s+pointer\s+encountered\s+in\s+Rx\s+ring\,\s+skipping\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. ver updates (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:13:58 +0100; rs/net/Kconfig | 1 drivers/net/atp.; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00774.html (8,324 bytes)
2. LL pointer encountered in Rx ring, skipping (score: 1): Author: eff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:21:39 +0100; to the fwmark before comparing it wit; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00775.html (8,204 bytes)
3. rnative version of S/390 shared NIC support (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:52:35 +0100; No, just restore the code that you; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00852.html (10,020 bytes)
4. LL pointer encountered in Rx ring, skipping (score: 1): Author: rrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:49:27 +0100; s (devno): --net--\ \--/ /--devno--; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00853.html (10,964 bytes)
5. sis900: eth0: NULL pointer encountered in Rx ring, skipping (score: 1): Author: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:13:58 +0100; Hi, I can make one of my machines, which has an on-board sis900 NIC, lose network connectivity within seconds by doing something like "nc -l -p 6666 > /dev/null" and then blasting some data towards i; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02264.html (8,324 bytes)
6. Re: sis900: eth0: NULL pointer encountered in Rx ring, skipping (score: 1): Author: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:21:39 +0100; eth0: Memory squeeze,deferring packet. So apparently it just doesn't deal with OOM very well. --L; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02265.html (8,262 bytes)
7. Re: sis900: eth0: NULL pointer encountered in Rx ring, skipping (score: 1): Author: Eric Lemoine <eric.lemoine@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:52:35 +0100; There are dev_alloc_skb()'s failing due to memory shortage. I think anyhow that the sis9000 driver doesnt handle "memory squeeze" situations right. Why not throwing current rx packet away and reuse r; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02342.html (10,107 bytes)
8. Re: sis900: eth0: NULL pointer encountered in Rx ring, skipping (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:49:27 +0100; Eric Lemoine <eric.lemoine@xxxxxxxxx> : [...] Imho it should not be necessary as long as the hardware is not completely b0rken. I'd rather see how the driver behaves when it is really short of memory; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02343.html (11,090 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]