Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sin6_scope_id\s+$Re\:\s+SIOCGIFCONF\s+and\s+IPv6\s+addresses$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sin6_scope_id\s+$Re\:\s+SIOCGIFCONF\s+and\s+IPv6\s+addresses$\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:36:08 +0900; Hmm, please tell me what you think ugly (or wrong). -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Web Page: http://www.ecei.tohoku.ac.jp/%7Eyoshfuji/ PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515 1323 1806; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00129.html (9,860 bytes)
2. Re: sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses) (score: 1): Author: t@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:14:35 +0300 (MSK); Ugly? Well, all. 8)8) Do not be bothered, "ugly" is aestetical rather than technical category. As rule, author understands this himself by plain peering at his product. F.e. how do you find putting; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00135.html (9,985 bytes)
3. Re: sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses) (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:54:47 -0800; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00140.html (10,853 bytes)
4. Re: sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses) (score: 1): Author: Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:29:41 +0300 (MSK); /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00141.html (33,281 bytes)
5. Re: sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses) (score: 1): Author: reearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 08:45:05 +0900; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00146.html (10,306 bytes)
6. sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses) (score: 1): Author: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:36:08 +0900; Hmm, please tell me what you think ugly (or wrong). -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Web Page: http://www.ecei.tohoku.ac.jp/%7Eyoshfuji/ PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515 1323 1806; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00300.html (9,965 bytes)
7. Re: sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses) (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:14:35 +0300 (MSK); Hello! Ugly? Well, all. 8)8) Do not be bothered, "ugly" is aestetical rather than technical category. As rule, author understands this himself by plain peering at his product. F.e. how do you find pu; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00306.html (10,017 bytes)
8. Re: sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses) (score: 1): Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:54:47 -0800; Hello, Alexey, we understand your opinion. I think it is reasonable. Actually, Yoshfuji's patch is just a conceputal one. We have recognizeed that we have need to improve it in order to adopt in Linu; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00311.html (10,943 bytes)
9. Re: sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses) (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:29:41 +0300 (MSK); Hello! I append reworked patch. It is preliminary version. Please, check and comment, if you find something wrong. Alexey diff -ur ../vger3-000223/linux/include/linux/in6.h linux/include/linux/in6.h; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00312.html (33,303 bytes)
10. Re: sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses) (score: 1): Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 08:45:05 +0900; Hello, Thanks !! We are very pleased at your help. It seems good for me at a glance. We will survey and check it at detail and make a report to you. Thanks again. -- SEKIYA Yuji USC/ISI Computer Net; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00317.html (10,386 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]