Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*send\-to\-self\s+\(was\s+Re\:\s+routing\s+bug\s+report\s+for\s+2\.4\)\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 00:57:21 +0300 (EEST)
ok, tested the 2.5 version, the patch files are updated: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#loop - added missing dev_put on ENETDOWN - removed the checks that ignore oif for local routes as Alexey suggests I ha
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00008.html (9,628 bytes)

2. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:07:12 -0700
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Ben Greear wrote: You should be able to easily test most of the changes your code if you have a machine with two ethernet interfaces and a loopback cable... ok, tested the 2.5 ve
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00009.html (12,768 bytes)

3. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 01:23:25 +0300 (EEST)
I tested telnet with replacing the prefsrc, as result, 'ip route get telnet_server_ip_on_eth1' returns local_ip_from_eth0 as src. telnetd listens as usually to 0.0.0.0, incoming connection comes (IP
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00011.html (8,309 bytes)

4. send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: avid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:43:26 +0300 (EEST)
w=2 Since there
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00843.html (12,334 bytes)

5. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:18:50 +0300 (EEST)
only place wher
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00849.html (8,895 bytes)

6. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:59:19 -0700
h 17 Apr 2003 0
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00862.html (11,807 bytes)

7. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:43:33 +0300 (EEST)
led look at thi
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00863.html (9,312 bytes)

8. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:22:46 -0500
46 af_inet6.c -
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00877.html (14,948 bytes)

9. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 00:57:21 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, ok, tested the 2.5 version, the patch files are updated: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#loop - added missing dev_put on ENETDOWN - removed the checks that ignore oif for local routes as Alexey suggest
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00697.html (9,695 bytes)

10. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:07:12 -0700
You should be able to easily test most of the changes your code if you have a machine with two ethernet interfaces and a loopback cable... ok, tested the 2.5 version, the patch files are updated: ht
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00698.html (12,234 bytes)

11. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 01:23:25 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, I tested telnet with replacing the prefsrc, as result, 'ip route get telnet_server_ip_on_eth1' returns local_ip_from_eth0 as src. telnetd listens as usually to 0.0.0.0, incoming connection com
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00700.html (8,333 bytes)

12. send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:43:26 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, Ben, lets define new behaviour for your feature: 1. we mark ethX with /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/ethX/loop=1. That means this is a loop device (my site contains lot of device flags, you can see w
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01742.html (12,388 bytes)

13. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:18:50 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, Ben, I have something for comments and testing (compiled only): http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/send-to-self-2.4.21-1.diff The usage should be: eth0/loop=1 eth1/loop=1 bind to src IP from eth0 and conne
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01748.html (8,957 bytes)

14. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:59:19 -0700
Ben, I have something for comments and testing (compiled only): http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/send-to-self-2.4.21-1.diff Just moved to my new home..will be a few days before I can take a detailed look at thi
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01761.html (11,612 bytes)

15. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:43:33 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, Right, my mistake, the routing is symmetric, arp_filter=1 is even recommended. Only rp_filter=1 can not be used as ARP filter but you can use rp_filter=1 for IP filtering. Right, you need just
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01762.html (9,336 bytes)

16. Re: send-to-self (was Re: routing bug report for 2.4) (score: 1)
Author: "James R. Leu" <jleu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:22:46 -0500
I have some done some work on a related subject, 'virtual routing and forwarding' for linux. One of the applications of this is 'self-to-self' routing. I have mentioned my work before on this list, a
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01776.html (15,149 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu