Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rsync\s+from\s+xfs\s+to\s+nfs\+xfs\s+and\s+ACL\s+problems\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1)
Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 13:50:15 +0200
Hello, I'm trying to rsync from an xfs with ACLs set to another server which has an xfs filesystem. I mounted the nfs using rw,noatime,nodiratime,acl,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,nfsvers=3,proto=tcp,mount
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00207.html (8,380 bytes)

2. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:33:04 +1000
NFSv3 doesn't support ACLs, IIRC. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00208.html (8,381 bytes)

3. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1)
Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:52:04 +0200
Le Tue, 18 May 2010 13:50:15 +0200 Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Use nfs4 instead, should be fine. Exports structure is different. The simple way is to simply add
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00211.html (8,597 bytes)

4. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1)
Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:04:37 +0200
Thank you for the hint. I remounted with nfs4 now: type nfs4 (rw,noatime,nodiratime,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,tcp,intr,acl) And now I get this on "rsync -aPvHAX": rsync: chown "somedir/Cen731n.afm" fai
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00228.html (9,566 bytes)

5. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:20:34 -0400
XFS stores ACLs different than other Linux filesystems because it's on-disk compatible to IRIX. While the other filesystems store the ACL in the same format that is used for the user interface XFS st
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00229.html (8,651 bytes)

6. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1)
Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:46:38 +0200
Thank you. Does that mean I can simply ignore that errors, and that everything is OK even over NFS? -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://pro
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00232.html (9,780 bytes)

7. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:51:51 -0400
Thinks should be okay - rsync probably has copied the ACLs via the normal system namespace. You can verify this by doing a getfacl on a nfs file that should havfe ACLs.
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00234.html (9,356 bytes)

8. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1)
Author: Linda Walsh <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 15:05:03 -0700
If the NFS system doesn't handle ACL's, you might try using "star" which can handle ACL's and extended file attributes storing them in an extended tar-format archive. It has a "-copy" feature that I'
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00293.html (9,197 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu