Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rsync\s+from\s+xfs\s+to\s+nfs\+xfs\s+and\s+ACL\s+problems\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rsync\s+from\s+xfs\s+to\s+nfs\+xfs\s+and\s+ACL\s+problems\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1): Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 13:50:15 +0200; Hello, I'm trying to rsync from an xfs with ACLs set to another server which has an xfs filesystem. I mounted the nfs using rw,noatime,nodiratime,acl,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,nfsvers=3,proto=tcp,mount; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00207.html (8,380 bytes)
2. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:33:04 +1000; NFSv3 doesn't support ACLs, IIRC. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00208.html (8,381 bytes)
3. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:52:04 +0200; Le Tue, 18 May 2010 13:50:15 +0200 Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Use nfs4 instead, should be fine. Exports structure is different. The simple way is to simply add; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00211.html (8,597 bytes)
4. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1): Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:04:37 +0200; Thank you for the hint. I remounted with nfs4 now: type nfs4 (rw,noatime,nodiratime,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,tcp,intr,acl) And now I get this on "rsync -aPvHAX": rsync: chown "somedir/Cen731n.afm" fai; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00228.html (9,566 bytes)
5. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:20:34 -0400; XFS stores ACLs different than other Linux filesystems because it's on-disk compatible to IRIX. While the other filesystems store the ACL in the same format that is used for the user interface XFS st; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00229.html (8,651 bytes)
6. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1): Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:46:38 +0200; Thank you. Does that mean I can simply ignore that errors, and that everything is OK even over NFS? -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://pro; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00232.html (9,780 bytes)
7. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:51:51 -0400; Thinks should be okay - rsync probably has copied the ACLs via the normal system namespace. You can verify this by doing a getfacl on a nfs file that should havfe ACLs.; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00234.html (9,356 bytes)
8. Re: rsync from xfs to nfs+xfs and ACL problems (score: 1): Author: Linda Walsh <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 15:05:03 -0700; If the NFS system doesn't handle ACL's, you might try using "star" which can handle ACL's and extended file attributes storing them in an extended tar-format archive. It has a "-copy" feature that I'; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00293.html (9,197 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]