Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*regarding\s+the\s+inode64\s+mount\s+option\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. regarding the inode64 mount option (score: 1)
Author: Michael Weissenbacher <mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 14:21:44 +0200
Hi XFS-List! I understand that the inode64 mount option allows inodes to be created beyond 1TB. There are also certain performance problems that can be cured by using this option when handling LOTS o
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00277.html (7,308 bytes)

2. Re: regarding the inode64 mount option (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:56:15 -0400
Actually they should still be accessible, we just won't create new inodes not addressable by 32bit inode numbers. It is available for 32bit kernels starting with kernel 2.6.29. There's an xfs_reno to
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00280.html (8,754 bytes)

3. Re: regarding the inode64 mount option (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:18:09 -0500
... http://sandeen.net/wordpress/?p=9 -Eric
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00285.html (7,919 bytes)

4. Re: regarding the inode64 mount option (score: 1)
Author: Michael Weissenbacher <mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:29:13 +0200
Hi Eric + Christoph! This is a scary list indeed! Does this apply only to Fedora on i686 or also to x86_64? In general, does the inode64 option make sense at all on a partition that is <1TB in size?
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00014.html (8,770 bytes)

5. Re: regarding the inode64 mount option (score: 1)
Author: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:24:47 -0500
Hi Eric + Christoph! http://sandeen.net/wordpress/?p=9 This is a scary list indeed! Does this apply only to Fedora on i686 or also to x86_64? In general, does the inode64 option make sense at all on
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00018.html (9,467 bytes)

6. Re: regarding the inode64 mount option (score: 1)
Author: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:13:22 -0500
[my unsent mail from yesterday, mostly for the second blob] On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:21:44PM +0200, Michael Weissenbacher wrote: Hi XFS-List! I understand that the inode64 mount option allows inode
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00020.html (9,934 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu