Bjorn is correct. You have to do a lot of work on your own. I posted questions regarding what I think is an exciting project - a hardware TCP/IP stack in silicon that has to play nicely with the exis
What redundancy do you expect to get? What will you be able to do that we cannot do today? You mean keeping two stacks in sync across two different machines, so that you can hot-swap processes or som
then don't do the project. You may get this to work with a experienced linux kernel-level networking hacker, but even then one month is unrealistic. You cannot just assume to learn everything about l
I think all those movies that begin by showing a boy longingly looking at the moon, and less than an hour later, we see the same character - perhaps a bit older in virtual time - navigate some spacec
/Switch /or MGControllers) single but with TCP Sandeep kalra Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on 06/01/2001 09:25:20 PM To: Sandeep Kalra/HSS@HSS cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Rajiv Roy/HSS@HSS Subjec
If you start modifying the stack, you will likely have to modify everything above it (ie the VOIP program). This will get nasty, because the client on the other end of the TCP connection will have it
u can take the idea with an example say that u get with a "single framework" to interact with the outer world what soever be the transport mechanism (weather it be a UDP or TCP or Message Q's ) so, t
hi all , list We am novice to the Linux TCP / IP stack arch, At present i want to implement redundancy at socket level in the Stack.. Can you please help me with some docs, information in this regard
hi david it is not that way, we have this project...nothing to start with ...just a pc with Linux 6.2 installed how to go for that ... i told u .. we am totally novice to the world of linux and also
Although David's response was somewhat harsh you have to understand that this list consists mostly of people that do this on their spare time. Moreover, Linux is based on people doing things freely a
Bjorn is correct. You have to do a lot of work on your own. I posted questions regarding what I think is an exciting project - a hardware TCP/IP stack in silicon that has to play nicely with the exis
What redundancy do you expect to get? What will you be able to do that we cannot do today? You mean keeping two stacks in sync across two different machines, so that you can hot-swap processes or som
then don't do the project. You may get this to work with a experienced linux kernel-level networking hacker, but even then one month is unrealistic. You cannot just assume to learn everything about l
I think all those movies that begin by showing a boy longingly looking at the moon, and less than an hour later, we see the same character - perhaps a bit older in virtual time - navigate some spacec
hi, /Switch /or MGControllers) single but with TCP Sandeep kalra Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on 06/01/2001 09:25:20 PM To: Sandeep Kalra/HSS@HSS cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Rajiv Roy/HSS@HSS Sub
If you start modifying the stack, you will likely have to modify everything above it (ie the VOIP program). This will get nasty, because the client on the other end of the TCP connection will have it
u can take the idea with an example say that u get with a "single framework" to interact with the outer world what soever be the transport mechanism (weather it be a UDP or TCP or Message Q's ) so, t
hi all , list We am novice to the Linux TCP / IP stack arch, At present i want to implement redundancy at socket level in the Stack.. Can you please help me with some docs, information in this regard