Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*r8169\:\s+panic\s+on\s+2\.6\.11\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:28:04 -0800
I was intentionally over stressing r8169 without NAPI to test out an alternative version of netif_rx, and discovered the following bug. Looks like a problem in r8169. I was using pktgen to overwhelm
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00225.html (10,008 bytes)

2. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: er@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:37:39 -0500
Stephen Hemminger wrote: I was intentionally over stressing r8169 without NAPI to test out an alternative version of netif_rx, and discovered the following bug. Looks like a problem in r8169. I was u
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00227.html (9,335 bytes)

3. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: dgar.iglesias@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 22:39:11 +0100
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> : Thanks. I'm on it. -- Ueimor
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00228.html (8,590 bytes)

4. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: arzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 22:50:44 +0100
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : I have been reported that the driver is not protected against oversized frames since 2.6.10 at least... I've just got an instant reboot on the sparc box while testin
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00229.html (9,006 bytes)

5. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: n Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:53:17 -0800
NAPI is not enabled, it is the IRQ version. Hitting Added instrumentation:. skb=0xd1e28380 len=8172 head=d1e32000 data=d1e32012 tail=d1e33ffe end=d1e32620 Looks like the board is running back-to-back
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00232.html (9,790 bytes)

6. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: rzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:02:14 +0100
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> : /me scratches head: play with the interframe gap ? Please. diff -puN drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-470 drivers/net/r8169.c -- linux-2.6.11/drivers/net/r8169.c~r8
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00233.html (11,756 bytes)

7. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:28:53 -0600
Shouldn't the above be dev->mtu (instead of tp->rx_buf_sz), otherwise there won't be enough room for ethernet header, CRC, etc.
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00238.html (11,766 bytes)

8. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:49:03 -0800
I am really killing this poor beast, the target is a 1.2 Ghz Celeron and it is trying to handle 1,000,000 packets/sec (from tg3 Opteron) Added this and took out "too much work at interrupt message" -
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00241.html (21,245 bytes)

9. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: ardi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:58:04 +0100
Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> : There is no room left in the buffer. I want it to be translated into the biggest skb_put() possible. tp->rx_buf_sz already account the headers (see rtl8169_set_rxbufs
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00242.html (9,770 bytes)

10. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 01:37:35 +0100
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> : Ok (leaks but see below). ^^^^^^ 3ff0 would be a ~16k packet. The high weight byte is missing: the descriptor would be strictly somewhere between the first d
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00245.html (11,271 bytes)

11. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:03:50 -0600
I tested the patch below on amd64, and have found a problem. My adapter always has the FOVF bit set, so the adapter never pings. After looking at the opts1 register output of my adapter and Steven's,
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00252.html (12,134 bytes)

12. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: ala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:34:16 -0800
The packet burst is 10 million 64 byte packets. Could be the sender or switch causing merging, but I suspect the r8169 on the slow receiver. Details are: Params: count 10000000 min_pkt_size: 60 max_p
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00255.html (9,928 bytes)

13. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: earb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:59:36 -0800
Doesn't come up because it gets that bit set in the normal case. eth0: Rx ERROR status=328440ff!!!
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00436.html (10,304 bytes)

14. r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:28:04 -0800
I was intentionally over stressing r8169 without NAPI to test out an alternative version of netif_rx, and discovered the following bug. Looks like a problem in r8169. I was using pktgen to overwhelm
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02148.html (10,008 bytes)

15. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:37:39 -0500
Stephen Hemminger wrote: I was intentionally over stressing r8169 without NAPI to test out an alternative version of netif_rx, and discovered the following bug. Looks like a problem in r8169. I was u
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02150.html (9,413 bytes)

16. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 22:39:11 +0100
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> : Thanks. I'm on it. -- Ueimor
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02151.html (8,652 bytes)

17. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 22:50:44 +0100
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : [...] I have been reported that the driver is not protected against oversized frames since 2.6.10 at least... I've just got an instant reboot on the sparc box while
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02152.html (9,085 bytes)

18. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:53:17 -0800
NAPI is not enabled, it is the IRQ version. Hitting Added instrumentation:. skb=0xd1e28380 len=8172 head=d1e32000 data=d1e32012 tail=d1e33ffe end=d1e32620 Looks like the board is running back-to-back
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02155.html (10,047 bytes)

19. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:02:14 +0100
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> : [...] /me scratches head: play with the interframe gap ? Please. diff -puN drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-470 drivers/net/r8169.c -- linux-2.6.11/drivers/net/r816
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02156.html (12,018 bytes)

20. Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11 (score: 1)
Author: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:28:53 -0600
Shouldn't the above be dev->mtu (instead of tp->rx_buf_sz), otherwise there won't be enough room for ethernet header, CRC, etc.
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02161.html (11,886 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu