Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*pwdb\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*pwdb\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 22:12:02 -0700 (PDT); Has anyone seen this message before: PAM_pwdb[92]: get passwd; pwdb: structure is no longer valid I get it when I try to login after I've typed in the root password when I'm using the RPM packages f; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00000.html (7,287 bytes)
2. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 20:55:56 +0200; I think I've seen those messages myself somewhen in the past. Afair it's some incompatibility between PAM versions, so upgrading / recompiling should help. I just tried to check some details on my In; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00001.html (8,633 bytes)
3. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 13:10:30 -0700 (PDT); Maybe I can downgrade PAM or would that cause every other program to break? I think this is because login is from the old util-linux and thus compiled against an old version of PAM. Did the compile o; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00002.html (8,968 bytes)
4. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 23:14:12 +0200; Silly construction, I don't even know if the damn thing is actually broken or just the content got garbled. What's worse, PROM and IRIX refuse to set the eaddr in the NVRAM nor can I otherwise ifconf; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00003.html (9,253 bytes)
5. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: sprasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Srinivasa Prasad Thirumalachar); Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 14:18:51 -0700 (PDT); According to Ralf Baechle ... If the NVRAM is corrupted eaddr may not be set up. Try rebooting the Indy, if the nvram is corrupted it will set it up with a set of good defaults which can be changed.; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00004.html (9,523 bytes)
6. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Brent Casavant <bcasavan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 16:21:58 -0500; A bit off-topic, but what exactly are you replacing? The NVRAM or the Indy. I have this sinking feeling my Indigo's NVRAM is nearing the end of its life, with the TOD clock getting reset to 1970 on r; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00005.html (9,354 bytes)
7. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 23:25:15 +0200; Basically my Indy is all back to defaults with exception of the eaddr which is filled with garbage that isn't a legal Ethernet address. Ralf; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00006.html (9,137 bytes)
8. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 23:29:08 +0200; Welcome to the club. Afaik the IP20 (what is that in product name?) is using the same NVRAM chip as the Indy, a DS1386 or maybe also it's predecessor, the DS1286. The battery is integrated together w; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00007.html (9,062 bytes)
9. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 14:33:46 -0700 (PDT); I have seen exactly the same behaviour on an Indy here. It seems like this is a common problem. Do you think it would help with a new PROM? Ulf; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00008.html (9,212 bytes)
10. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 23:56:30 +0200; Well, the problem is that the PROMs and IRIX deliberately refuse to overwrite the value of eaddr. As I understand there is a special IRIX kernel used for manufacturing / testing the Indy that is comp; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00009.html (9,387 bytes)
11. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 15:04:39 -0700 (PDT); I think that you can actually bootp another sash, so if you get a sash that is compiled with MFG_EADDR or something it may be possible. Then again I don't know anything about this stuff. I'll look ar; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00010.html (9,446 bytes)
12. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 15:12:53 -0700 (PDT); I should think before I write. Of course you can't bootp it if you don't have a correct eaddr... Ulf; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00011.html (8,631 bytes)
13. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 00:51:48 +0200; Yeah, we all enjoy that sudden explosion of personal intelligence in the very second after hitting the return key ... Ralf; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00015.html (9,238 bytes)
14. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 21:48:51 +0200; I managed to get my Indy partially working again, so was able to check my packages. There is a util-linux package, the name is RPMS/mips-binutils-2.8.1/util-linux-2.9o-13lm.mips.rpm, you should have; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00017.html (8,905 bytes)
15. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 23:24:12 -0700 (PDT); I found this package now. I didn't know about the mips-binutils-2.8.1 directory. I have installed the packages from the mips directory, do you think those are ok? Thanks, Ulf; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00018.html (8,179 bytes)
16. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 20:24:10 +0200; Anybody want to modify serial numbers? One service contract per site is good enough ... (Only SNI makes that easier, includes the necessary tool in the PROM ...) Ralf; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00020.html (9,384 bytes)
17. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 00:15:27 +0200; The packages in mips-binutils-2.8.1 have been built with binutils 2.8.1. Those in the mips subdirectory have mostly been built with my private binutils 2.9.5 version which tagged it's binaries with t; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00021.html (9,011 bytes)
18. pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 22:12:02 -0700 (PDT); Hi, Has anyone seen this message before: PAM_pwdb[92]: get passwd; pwdb: structure is no longer valid I get it when I try to login after I've typed in the root password when I'm using the RPM package; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00088.html (7,287 bytes)
19. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 20:55:56 +0200; I think I've seen those messages myself somewhen in the past. Afair it's some incompatibility between PAM versions, so upgrading / recompiling should help. I just tried to check some details on my In; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00089.html (8,767 bytes)
20. Re: pwdb (score: 1): Author: Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 13:10:30 -0700 (PDT); Maybe I can downgrade PAM or would that cause every other program to break? I think this is because login is from the old util-linux and thus compiled against an old version of PAM. Did the compile o; /archives/linux-origin/2000-05/msg00090.html (8,996 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]