Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*purpose\s+of\s+the\s+skb\s+head\s+pool\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*purpose\s+of\s+the\s+skb\s+head\s+pool\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 12:38:38 +0200; Can you rerun this test with random source/destination addresses, to get more realistic (for some configurations) numbers?; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00003.html (8,184 bytes)
2. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 02:35:28 -0700 (PDT); Can you rerun this test with random source/destination addresses, to get more realistic (for some configurations) numbers? He can do this, but the issues we're trying to tackle first have nothing to; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00004.html (7,867 bytes)
3. purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: r" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:55:06 +0200; point f; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00221.html (7,806 bytes)
4. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:03:17 +0200; ator we; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00222.html (8,505 bytes)
5. purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:05:35 +0200; y worth; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00223.html (17,894 bytes)
6. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: ogdan Costescu <bogdan.costescu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:11:38 +0200; kb_head; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00224.html (8,399 bytes)
7. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 06:08:34 -0700 (PDT); s. --ro; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00225.html (8,408 bytes)
8. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:16:08 +0200; ply it.; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00226.html (8,906 bytes)
9. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 06:12:49 -0700 (PDT); ached..; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00227.html (8,617 bytes)
10. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:21:02 +0200; lready.; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00228.html (13,323 bytes)
11. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: rasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:39:00 -0700 (PDT); impleme; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00250.html (8,628 bytes)
12. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 12:38:38 +0200; Can you rerun this test with random source/destination addresses, to get more realistic (for some configurations) numbers?; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00405.html (8,363 bytes)
13. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 02:35:28 -0700 (PDT); Can you rerun this test with random source/destination addresses, to get more realistic (for some configurations) numbers? He can do this, but the issues we're trying to tackle first have nothing to; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00406.html (8,029 bytes)
14. purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:55:06 +0200; [sorry, wrong Cc: the first time] net/core/skbuf.c has a small per-cpu pool to keep some hot skbufs around instead of returning them to the system allocator. But if you loook at the slab allocator we; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00489.html (7,806 bytes)
15. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:03:17 +0200; The code was added before slab grew an own per cpu allocator. AFAIK it wasn't removed because the "extreme routing" people like Jamal and Robert O. still saw small advantages, but it's probably worth; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00490.html (8,563 bytes)
16. purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:05:35 +0200; Hello! Well just happened test without it yesterday... Manfred is working on some improvements of the slab (magazine layer) so I tested this. It seems to do improve performance. I also removed the sk; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00491.html (17,952 bytes)
17. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:11:38 +0200; Do we need a test run without Manfreds (soon coming) magazine patch too? Cheers. --ro; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00492.html (8,488 bytes)
18. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 06:08:34 -0700 (PDT); Do we need a test run without Manfreds (soon coming) magazine patch too? Nope. I'm personally convinced, someone send me a patch to kill it off and I'll apply it.; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00493.html (8,531 bytes)
19. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:16:08 +0200; Robert's first reply on this subject had it attached..; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00494.html (9,114 bytes)
20. Re: purpose of the skb head pool (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 06:12:49 -0700 (PDT); Robert's first reply on this subject had it attached.. I deleted it, can someone resend me a copy? When I ask for a patch, it usually means that I've /dev/null'd the entire thread already.; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00495.html (8,745 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]