Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*performance\s+question\:\s+delay\s+interrupts\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. performance question: delay interrupts (score: 1)
Author: Marcell Gal <cell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:12:42 +0200
Hello Guys, Is there any way (for some ethernet drivers at least) to delay interrupts (eg. with x00 us), so that many packets are serviced in one go instead of many proc-time-eating interrupts? Alan
/archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00081.html (7,636 bytes)

2. Re: performance question: delay interrupts (score: 1)
Author: Donald Becker <becker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:04:02 -0400 (EDT)
Sure, and drivers already do this. If you work through the problem, doing this purely in software is complicated and might not be worth the extra complexity for general purpose systems. If you have s
/archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00086.html (10,336 bytes)

3. Re: performance question: delay interrupts (score: 1)
Author: Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:17:55 -0400
Marcell> Alan says the Nicstar ATM card has HW support for [369]00 us INT delay. Marcell> Any ethernet cards known to have similar smart features? Marcell> Is anything like this configurable for som
/archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00087.html (8,243 bytes)

4. Re: performance question: delay interrupts (score: 1)
Author: Donald Becker <becker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:53:38 -0400 (EDT)
This is the common software Tx interrupt mitigation. Most descriptor based drivers use this. Timers are common, but not ubiquitous. A usual issue with Ethernet adapter hardware timers is that the tim
/archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00089.html (9,085 bytes)

5. Re: performance question: delay interrupts (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 07:34:44 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Donald, I will be interested and i think it would make a good Linux conference paper at least. BTW, i couldnt find Josip Loncaric's thread on this ... do you have a specific URL? (in any case that
/archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00104.html (12,017 bytes)

6. performance question: delay interrupts (score: 1)
Author: Marcell Gal <cell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:12:42 +0200
Hello Guys, Is there any way (for some ethernet drivers at least) to delay interrupts (eg. with x00 us), so that many packets are serviced in one go instead of many proc-time-eating interrupts? Alan
/archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00210.html (7,636 bytes)

7. Re: performance question: delay interrupts (score: 1)
Author: Donald Becker <becker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:04:02 -0400 (EDT)
Sure, and drivers already do this. If you work through the problem, doing this purely in software is complicated and might not be worth the extra complexity for general purpose systems. If you have s
/archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00215.html (10,376 bytes)

8. Re: performance question: delay interrupts (score: 1)
Author: Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:17:55 -0400
Marcell> Alan says the Nicstar ATM card has HW support for [369]00 us INT delay. Marcell> Any ethernet cards known to have similar smart features? Marcell> Is anything like this configurable for som
/archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00216.html (8,327 bytes)

9. Re: performance question: delay interrupts (score: 1)
Author: Donald Becker <becker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:53:38 -0400 (EDT)
This is the common software Tx interrupt mitigation. Most descriptor based drivers use this. Timers are common, but not ubiquitous. A usual issue with Ethernet adapter hardware timers is that the tim
/archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00218.html (9,128 bytes)

10. Re: performance question: delay interrupts (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 07:34:44 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Donald, I will be interested and i think it would make a good Linux conference paper at least. BTW, i couldnt find Josip Loncaric's thread on this ... do you have a specific URL? (in any case that
/archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00233.html (12,064 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu