Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*patches\s+for\s+PROC_FS\=n\s+\(2\.6\.0\-test7\)\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: en <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:16:46 -0700
drivers/char/toshiba.c and net/atm/clip.c don't build if PROC_FS=n. Patches for them are available at: http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/toshiba_inline_260t7.patch http://developer.osdl.org/
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00300.html (8,458 bytes)

2. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:08:52 -0700
How can this be needed? When procfs is disabled then remove_proc_entry() is defined as "do { } while (0)", ie. a nop.
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00317.html (8,837 bytes)

3. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:40:08 +0200
Due to this - the real offender: include <linux/proc_fs.h> include <linux/seq_file.h> Sam
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00321.html (10,010 bytes)

4. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: m@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:40:25 -0700
That makes a whole lot more sense, here is the fix I just checked in: diff -Nru a/net/atm/clip.c b/net/atm/clip.c -- a/net/atm/clip.c Sat Oct 11 12:43:12 2003 +++ b/net/atm/clip.c Sat Oct 11 12:43:12
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00322.html (10,346 bytes)

5. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:24:33 -0700
include <linux/proc_fs.h> include <linux/seq_file.h> ugh, thanks. -- ~Randy
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00326.html (9,694 bytes)

6. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 19:17:25 -0700
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:06:29 -0700 (PDT) "Noah J. Misch" <noah@xxxxxxxxxxx> ipx is merged. I'll leave siimage and llc to Noah. Patch below fixes af_bluetooth. Comments on it? -- ~Randy patch_name: bt
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00336.html (9,870 bytes)

7. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: unlap@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 20:13:16 -0700
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:06:29 -0700 (PDT) "Noah J. Misch" <noah@xxxxxxxxxxx> Here's a patch for the wireless/arlan driver for PROC_FS=n. Currently it defines both a function and a macro for init_arlan
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00337.html (10,241 bytes)

8. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:49:29 -0700
Hi Elmer, Sure, I understand the last comment. I don't quite understand the first paragraph though. Could we try again? Currently arlan.c + arlan-proc.c does not build if CONFIG_PROC_FS=n. The Makefi
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00339.html (9,481 bytes)

9. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: g@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:31:30 +0200 (EET)
arlan.c is ok without arlan-proc.c as init_arlan_proc is in arlan-proc.c, it shoult be OK, as long as radio parameters are saved into cards ROM. I have forgot a lot about that code, of course. Elmer
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00341.html (8,799 bytes)

10. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
That fix looks like the best to me. I did notice also that proc_bt_rfcomm and proc_bt_hci have similar #ifdef wrappers. I think that's okay since they aren't EXPORT_SYMBOL-ed, and they're used in fe
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00361.html (11,583 bytes)

11. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: ah@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
I poked around the driver a bit and uncovered a few points that suggest to me a different approach to the problem. The file arlan-proc.c contains a number of functions supporting the driver's sysctl
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00362.html (12,015 bytes)

12. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: ah@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:12:31 -0700
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:52:56 -0700 (PDT) "Noah J. Misch" <noah@xxxxxxxxxxx> a Right. That's about what I was planning to do next if I didn't hear anything else from Elmer. that I wouldn't prefer this
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00363.html (11,330 bytes)

13. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: unlap@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:39:52 +0200 (EET)
on the other hand, consider following: 1. the card is shit, also, on ISA interface 2. most people do write configuration parameters into cards BIOS under DOS and do not need interface for configurati
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00364.html (8,779 bytes)

14. patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:16:46 -0700
drivers/char/toshiba.c and net/atm/clip.c don't build if PROC_FS=n. Patches for them are available at: http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/toshiba_inline_260t7.patch http://developer.osdl.org/
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg01042.html (8,488 bytes)

15. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:08:52 -0700
How can this be needed? When procfs is disabled then remove_proc_entry() is defined as "do { } while (0)", ie. a nop.
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg01059.html (8,932 bytes)

16. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:40:08 +0200
Due to this - the real offender: include <linux/proc_fs.h> include <linux/seq_file.h> Sam
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg01063.html (10,139 bytes)

17. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:40:25 -0700
That makes a whole lot more sense, here is the fix I just checked in: diff -Nru a/net/atm/clip.c b/net/atm/clip.c -- a/net/atm/clip.c Sat Oct 11 12:43:12 2003 +++ b/net/atm/clip.c Sat Oct 11 12:43:12
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg01064.html (10,481 bytes)

18. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:24:33 -0700
include <linux/proc_fs.h> include <linux/seq_file.h> ugh, thanks. -- ~Randy
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg01068.html (9,844 bytes)

19. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 19:17:25 -0700
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:06:29 -0700 (PDT) "Noah J. Misch" <noah@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ipx is merged. I'll leave siimage and llc to Noah. Patch below fixes af_bluetooth. Comments on it? -- ~Randy patch_n
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg01078.html (10,006 bytes)

20. Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) (score: 1)
Author: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 20:13:16 -0700
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:06:29 -0700 (PDT) "Noah J. Misch" <noah@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Here's a patch for the wireless/arlan driver for PROC_FS=n. Currently it defines both a function and a macro for ini
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg01079.html (10,377 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu