Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*patch\:\s+introduce\s+simple\s+actions\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. TCPMSS (score: 1)
Author: 明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2005 14:05:51 -0500
Ive posted this before - dont want it to sit here rotting. If theres nothing glaringly wrong with it (Thomas/Patrick?) then Dave please apply so i can start shooting other patches based on it. cheers
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01138.html (8,599 bytes)

2. TCPMSS (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:22:52 +0100
Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: Ive posted this before - dont want it to sit here rotting. If theres nothing glaringly wrong with it (Thomas/Patrick?) then Dave please apply so i can start shooting other pat
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01142.html (9,132 bytes)

3. /tulip) (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2005 14:35:45 -0500
A lot of the code is very common. I am essentially sticking some common code as inlines to allow someone to write some very simple code - probably just the packet processing function - see attached s
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01146.html (10,249 bytes)

4. actions (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:44:08 +0100
* Jamal Hadi Salim <1111345551.1095.82.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-20 14:05 Looks good to me, see two minor comments below. Maybe do a size sanity check here for TCA_DEF_PARMS? tcf_defact, tc_def
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01148.html (10,941 bytes)

5. lem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1)
Author: do@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:58:30 +0100
Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 14:22, Patrick McHardy wrote: One of the next things I wanted to do in this area was moving all the large inline functions to act_generic.c, so if possib
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01149.html (10,305 bytes)

6. ce simple actions (score: 1)
Author: er@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2005 15:10:27 -0500
Will do. sigh. another LinuxWay(tm). Unfortunately this is all over the net/sched code to imply something thats user specific vs kernel specific. If you feel strongly about it i will change it - othe
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01150.html (10,557 bytes)

7. Experimental Driver for Neterion/S2io 10GbE Adapters (score: 1)
Author: Todorovic <kostodo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2005 15:17:34 -0500
Unfortunately code "augmentation"( as opposed to inheritance - cant think of a better word) is much easier to do this way. The benefit of it is the user gets a very simple programming interface - whi
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01152.html (11,378 bytes)

8. io 10GbE Adapters (score: 1)
Author: al Hadi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:18:36 +0100
Yes I know and I don't feel that strong about it. I just tend to dislike it a tiny bit, I do like the struct rta_kern style better. Let's wait for the brave knight to appear someday.
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01153.html (9,421 bytes)

9. ce simple actions (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:31:22 +0100
* Jamal Hadi Salim <1111349853.1093.136.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-20 15:17 Yes, we do have to find some way to document all this in a proper way. Maybe we can write some _really_ technical refe
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01154.html (9,511 bytes)

10. h: introduce simple actions (score: 1)
Author: <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2005 15:41:53 -0500
Agreed - this as well as the ematch etc. not sure if the current howto will be the proper place - but somewhere close to it. There has been a lot of very interesting new things going in and there see
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01156.html (10,451 bytes)

11. to start a pppoe conn., crash at net/core/skbuff.c:91 (score: 1)
Author: OR" <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:27:27 +0100
Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: Unfortunately code "augmentation"( as opposed to inheritance - cant think of a better word) is much easier to do this way. The benefit of it is the user gets a very simple pro
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01273.html (10,499 bytes)

12. e: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement (score: 1)
Author: k <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:58:27 -0800
I'm waiting for this, send whenever it's ready. You may want to add the standard stuff to that header file BTW, ala: /* foo.h: This is the foo interface header. * * Copyright (C) 2005 Jamal Hadi Sali
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01293.html (9,439 bytes)

13. e: [22/*] [NETFILTER] Use correct IPsec MTU in TCPMSS (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: 22 Mar 2005 23:06:39 -0500
I will tommorow - need to plonk tonight dang, yes. Thanks - will do. cheers, jamal
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01296.html (10,261 bytes)

14. patch: introduce simple actions (score: 1)
Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2005 14:05:51 -0500
Ive posted this before - dont want it to sit here rotting. If theres nothing glaringly wrong with it (Thomas/Patrick?) then Dave please apply so i can start shooting other patches based on it. cheers
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03061.html (8,599 bytes)

15. Re: patch: introduce simple actions (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:22:52 +0100
Any reasons why all of these need to be inline functions? One of the next things I wanted to do in this area was moving all the large inline functions to act_generic.c, so if possible I would prefer
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03065.html (9,218 bytes)

16. Re: patch: introduce simple actions (score: 1)
Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2005 14:35:45 -0500
A lot of the code is very common. I am essentially sticking some common code as inlines to allow someone to write some very simple code - probably just the packet processing function - see attached s
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03069.html (10,329 bytes)

17. Re: patch: introduce simple actions (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:44:08 +0100
* Jamal Hadi Salim <1111345551.1095.82.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-20 14:05 Looks good to me, see two minor comments below. Maybe do a size sanity check here for TCA_DEF_PARMS? tcf_defact, tc_def
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03071.html (11,005 bytes)

18. Re: patch: introduce simple actions (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:58:30 +0100
One of the next things I wanted to do in this area was moving all the large inline functions to act_generic.c, so if possible I would prefer not to put these in a header file. These are small functi
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03072.html (10,406 bytes)

19. Re: patch: introduce simple actions (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2005 15:10:27 -0500
Will do. sigh. another LinuxWay(tm). Unfortunately this is all over the net/sched code to imply something thats user specific vs kernel specific. If you feel strongly about it i will change it - othe
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03073.html (10,647 bytes)

20. Re: patch: introduce simple actions (score: 1)
Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2005 15:17:34 -0500
Unfortunately code "augmentation"( as opposed to inheritance - cant think of a better word) is much easier to do this way. The benefit of it is the user gets a very simple programming interface - whi
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03075.html (11,514 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu