Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*patch\:\s+Action\s+repeat\s*$/: 58 ]

Total 58 documents matching your query.

1. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 08:10:38 -0400
[..] Which means the classid is not reset by exec(). I would say that if dummy changes it because of a policy, then thats a fair deal. i.e filter blah blah \ action add meta classid global :23 I am b
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00015.html (11,151 bytes)

2. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 17:06:32 +0200
* jamal <1115035838.8929.236.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-02 08:10 Absolutely, given it is requested by the user. My main concern are dependencies on classid invisble to the user. What about
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00022.html (10,301 bytes)

3. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 16:28:33 -0700
Applied, thanks Jamal.
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00121.html (8,189 bytes)

4. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 07:46:34 -0400
[..] Basically, something along those lines (eg struct tca_pkt_info) in which the tcf_result is one of the components should do it. I would be satisfied with this being the structure in the ->act() p
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00145.html (11,958 bytes)

5. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 14:15:24 +0200
I'll do it, I have a few patches touching this code lying around anyway Regards Patrick
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00146.html (10,028 bytes)

6. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 14:31:57 +0200
* jamal <1115207194.7665.109.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-04 07:46 Sounds good. I have no objections but fail to see why we want to clear it anyway?
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00147.html (10,888 bytes)

7. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 08:59:08 -0400
If its scope is local i.e for one device, then not reseting could confuse the next device that sees it and tries to classify on it. cheers, jamal
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00148.html (10,604 bytes)

8. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 15:28:22 +0200
* jamal <1115211549.7665.140.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-04 08:59 OK, so we're not talking about a reset in action_exec() but rather in tc_classify() or enqueue()?
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00150.html (10,472 bytes)

9. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 15:33:06 +0200
* Thomas Graf <20050504132822.GB18452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-04 15:28 Sorry, little bit to vague, what I mean is before the first call to tc_classify() or enqueue() on a new device.
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00151.html (10,792 bytes)

10. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 09:33:20 -0400
in skb_clone() and friends. Look at CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT in net/core/skbuff.c cheers, jamal
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00152.html (11,175 bytes)

11. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 15:48:15 +0200
* jamal <1115213600.7665.166.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-04 09:33 Yes this solves the case for dummy devices etc but how would this cause a reset on the way from ingress to egress?
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00153.html (10,421 bytes)

12. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 09:53:02 -0400
If the verdict is not to reset, there should be no clearing of those fields from ingress -> egress until the skb is either freed or someone else along the path resets it. Cloning or copying inherits.
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00154.html (10,736 bytes)

13. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 16:05:40 +0200
* jamal <1115214782.7665.184.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-04 09:53 I guess not but we might have a different understanding of when to reset. From my point of view the only reason to reset any
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00155.html (10,841 bytes)

14. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 10:23:49 -0400
Agreed. So shall we stick then to just make it a global-only? cheers, jamal
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00156.html (10,314 bytes)

15. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 16:53:41 +0200
* jamal <1115216629.7906.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-04 10:23 As long as we can't find a way to have a well defined local scope which is both easy to implement and easy to understand for t
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00157.html (10,788 bytes)

16. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 09:06:39 -0400
ok - i will wait to see the patches from Patrick out first then do this. Its actually a simple change. cheers, jamal
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00199.html (10,501 bytes)

17. patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: en <tommy.christensen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:50:17 -0400
but fr
/archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01102.html (8,081 bytes)

18. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:06:56 +0200
ocument
/archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01103.html (8,648 bytes)

19. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:08:58 +0200
Patrick
/archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01104.html (8,685 bytes)

20. Re: patch: Action repeat (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 13:27:25 -0400
atrick
/archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01105.html (9,226 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu