Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*oops\s+in\s+ip

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*oops\s+in\s+ip_rcv\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 20:15:42 +1000; Im booting a recent 2.6.12-rc3++ git tree on ppc64. Just got an oops very early in boot, right after: TCP established hash table entries: 131072 (order: 9, 2097kernel: It looks like we tried to load; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00186.html (7,925 bytes)
2. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 21:40:54 +1000; Any idea why you'd be receiving packets this early? -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~her; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00191.html (8,736 bytes)
3. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 23:09:04 +1000; Not sure, although PCI has already been probed and tcp_init is called with interrupts on. Any reason we cant take a packet at this point? Im guessing its calling this: IP_INC_STATS_BH(IPSTATS_MIB_IN; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00201.html (8,290 bytes)
4. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: inger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 11:26:24 -0700; Can you test out putting the init_ipv4_mibs() call right before the comment: /* * Add all the base protocols. */ If it fixes things for you I'll put that upstream. Thanks. I still would really like t; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00219.html (8,992 bytes)
5. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 07:37:40 +1000; Could we delay the call of dev_add_pack(&ip_packet_type) until the very end of inet_init? That way we're guaranteed to not receive anything until it's ready. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.o; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00235.html (9,128 bytes)
6. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 07:44:53 +1000; This patch should do the trick. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00237.html (9,575 bytes)
7. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: .jones2@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 08:02:36 +1000; Here is the version of IPv6. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> H; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00242.html (9,844 bytes)
8. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 15:09:43 -0700; Of course... But I don't want to apply this until Anton tells us how in the world he is receiving packets so early in the boot. If I put this patch in now, he may get lazy just like me and never try; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00244.html (9,298 bytes)
9. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: n@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 09:49:11 +1000; Alright, that's simply a matter of dropping a BUG into netif_rx. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apan; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00265.html (9,551 bytes)
10. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: nton@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 11:02:46 +1000; You know me too well :) I start getting acenic irqs straight after the card is initialised: acenic.c: v0.92 08/05/2002 Jes Sorensen, linux-acenic@xxxxxxxxxx http://home.cern.ch/~jes/gige/acenic.html; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00268.html (10,802 bytes)
11. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 19:58:31 -0700; Thanks, this needs to be fixed. I bet some people would be very unpleased to know that an inteface that hasn't been brought up at least once will sit and receive broadcast frames :-/ Anyways, for now; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00276.html (9,242 bytes)
12. oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 20:15:42 +1000; Hi, Im booting a recent 2.6.12-rc3++ git tree on ppc64. Just got an oops very early in boot, right after: TCP established hash table entries: 131072 (order: 9, 2097kernel: It looks like we tried to l; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01475.html (7,925 bytes)
13. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 21:40:54 +1000; Any idea why you'd be receiving packets this early? -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~her; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01480.html (8,838 bytes)
14. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 23:09:04 +1000; Not sure, although PCI has already been probed and tcp_init is called with interrupts on. Any reason we cant take a packet at this point? Im guessing its calling this: IP_INC_STATS_BH(IPSTATS_MIB_IN; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01490.html (8,397 bytes)
15. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 11:26:24 -0700; Can you test out putting the init_ipv4_mibs() call right before the comment: /* * Add all the base protocols. */ If it fixes things for you I'll put that upstream. Thanks. I still would really like t; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01508.html (9,190 bytes)
16. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 07:37:40 +1000; Could we delay the call of dev_add_pack(&ip_packet_type) until the very end of inet_init? That way we're guaranteed to not receive anything until it's ready. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.o; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01524.html (9,387 bytes)
17. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 07:44:53 +1000; This patch should do the trick. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01526.html (9,857 bytes)
18. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 08:02:36 +1000; Here is the version of IPv6. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> H; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01531.html (10,156 bytes)
19. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 15:09:43 -0700; Of course... But I don't want to apply this until Anton tells us how in the world he is receiving packets so early in the boot. If I put this patch in now, he may get lazy just like me and never try; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01533.html (9,565 bytes)
20. Re: oops in ip_rcv (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 09:49:11 +1000; Alright, that's simply a matter of dropping a BUG into netif_rx. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apan; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01554.html (9,907 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]